For people who moved from brokerage into development, do you feel the move was worth it financially and lifestyle-wise?
Brokerage seems to have unlimited upside but development seems more stable and intellectually interesting.
| +51 | Long Game: Development vs Asset Management | 17 | 2h |
| +49 | What Is Your Backup Plan? | 21 | 3d |
| +36 | AvalonBay Equity Residential Merger discussion | 16 | 5d |
| +34 | Future of Real Estate | 9 | 5d |
| +28 | Extremely Slow Ramp Up | 5 | 4d |
| +24 | Future of Multifamily | 15 | 3h |
| +22 | CRE Banking @ Top 3 Bank or Asset Management at Public REIT | 13 | 2d |
| +21 | No IB RO considering RE | 9 | 4h |
| +19 | Most Correct Way to Grow Rents in MF Development Underwriting | 4 | 1d |
| +18 | PGIM investment analyst low pay | 15 | 5h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Based on the most helpful WSO content, the decision between brokerage and development depends on your long-term goals, personality, and priorities. Here's a breakdown of key insights:
Financial Upside:
Lifestyle:
Intellectual Interest:
Transitioning from Brokerage to Development:
Ultimately, the move from brokerage to development can be worth it if you value stability, intellectual engagement, and the potential for long-term equity. On the other hand, if you thrive in a high-energy, sales-driven environment and prioritize immediate financial upside, brokerage might be the better fit.
Sources: https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/real-estate/starting-my-career-in-cre-five-years-out-of-undergrad-brokerage-vs-development?customgpt=1, Can someone tell me the truth on CRE Brokerage profitability potential, Best path to Development?, Why does everyone want to be an analyst not a broker making way more money?
the unlimited upside of sales thing is kind of ridiculous. There are 24 hours in a day. You are capped on how much you can work. Therefore, you are capped on how much you can make because you can’t sell everything.
As someone who's in an analyst sort of role currently an developer/owner-operator shop, and paid pretty well with a pretty solid WLB, I'd go with being a broker. I feel like in a few years ai will get so strong the need for a young person to "crank" models and decks will be trimmed significantly, but Ai can't replace relationships, communication skills, and just simple hustle that a broker has/needs.
Interesting take. I started out as a broker (now at owner/dev) and enjoyed it but let's be honest brokers are gonna be the FIRST to go in this AI transition. Development is impossible to automate good luck to anyone that tries, genuinely. I've been thinking about going back to brokerage in the future but now that future is murkier than ever with AI extrapolated a couple years ahead. The real issue, which you partly alluded to, is that unfortunately for the young bucks, it's their seats that are going fast, the older guys with experience are the ones that will be able capitalize on the leverage being created by AI because as you said, relationships are here to stay but the grunt work which is performed mostly by analysts is whats disappearing. Those seats won't go away completely, but the amount of those seats will be drastically reduced. So if you have one hang on to it till you can become the older guy with the relationships.
Veritatis cum quam quia sit ut blanditiis itaque. Excepturi et qui ut eveniet sapiente suscipit. Quia fugit dolorem nihil et. Libero nulla ea voluptas et praesentium. Sit quam ipsam maiores.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...