16 Comments
 

Associate 2 in RE - Comm

Just the delinquent payments. The unpaid balance is not accelerated in a foreclosure.

What happens to a site when the loan balance exceeds the value of the land? And the loan can't be expunged through foreclosure. Does the project just sit until values somehow improve? I don't understand how the site is ever developable with a non-expungable loan

 

Presumably the C-PACE is collateralized by some improvements to the land; however, I don't know enough about this specific scenario to opine further. 

As a rescue capital vehicle, you can fund a C-PACE on existing improvements; therefore, there shouldn't be a scenario where the loan balance is indexed off the land value. That said, it does create a difficult situation where the debt stack exceeds as-is value. The C-PACE special assessment should be underwritten as an above the line tax expense in the event it is assumed by a new owner.

 

I generally see C-PACE transactions being done right now as part of new construction or rescue capital to fund cost overruns or pay down maturing debt. Variances in state legislation (e.g. SIR clauses) might make C-PACE more favorable for certain asset classes or retrofit projects. Historically C-PACE has backed non-institutional Sponsors, but I see institutional borrowers and senior lenders getting more and more comfortable with the idea (bc non-accelerable, pmts can be escrowed, freely transferable, etc etc). With pressures from municipal “green” legislation on CRE (e.g. Local Law 97 in NYC and BERDO and Boston)… landlords and lenders are going to see C-PACE transactions pick up meaningfully. Keep watch 👀

 

I think they work in deals where the interest rate on the senior sucks (ie, hotels). In other asset classes with better financing, it's less accretive. I've never been able to make the math work. The problem is senior lenders almost always underwrite the CPACE debt service as a property tax payment, so it's included in NOI for sizing purposes. So they end up dropping the senior loan amount to adjust for this. 

 

Well C-PACE is paid through a tax assessment so.... it will operated exactly as any other tax forclosure. 

It isn't in my opinion for designed for what most people want to use it for which is MF development for sale.  You should be using this stuff for long term hold redevelopment of NNN lease properties. This rolls off the risk from the senior lender to the credit of the tenant. If you combine this with a tax basis lock program you are essentially offsetting the tax impact for the tenant and replacing it with a long term fixed but known liability. 

 

ioncewenttoschool

Well C-PACE is paid through a tax assessment so.... it will operated exactly as any other tax forclosure. 

It isn't in my opinion for designed for what most people want to use it for which is MF development for sale.  You should be using this stuff for long term hold redevelopment of NNN lease properties. This rolls off the risk from the senior lender to the credit of the tenant. If you combine this with a tax basis lock program you are essentially offsetting the tax impact for the tenant and replacing it with a long term fixed but known liability. 

Are you sure it operates as any other tax foreclosure? In a typical tax foreclosure the debt is expunged a the lienholder takes title. I don't think that's how CPACE works. The debt isn't expunged, it stays with the land and is collected as any other assessment. That's why so many of the CPACE lenders are risk averse funds, they feel that this superpriority lien can't be erased

 

Placeat dolor quidem aut ipsum. Error ut et nostrum nobis nulla ut vitae. Fuga voluptas sed odit architecto harum ab numquam. Praesentium dolores nihil quas velit impedit et quia. Et perferendis et consequatur perspiciatis ut facilis atque. Tempore nisi tenetur autem optio cum tempore.

Debitis veniam est reprehenderit excepturi hic non. Est adipisci vero perferendis tempora est. Omnis non animi qui odio cupiditate non.

At vel laudantium quae eius molestiae. Ut non modi excepturi numquam ipsum id. Quis quos optio est ut. Quaerat nesciunt quia sunt.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (72) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”