Cash Multiple
What is the correct way to calculate a cash multiple?
Let's use an extreme cash to illustrate my point.
I buy a property for $10. Then cash flows are as follows:
Year 1: -$1,000 Year 2: $2,000 Year 3: -$4,000 Year 4 (Sale Year): $8,000
I have seen formulas that only treat purchase price as "invested" equity. So the cash multiple would be $5,000 / $10 or 500x.
But doesn't negative property cash flow count as "invested" equity, after all, someone has to pay for shortfall.
I have seen formulas sum all negative cash flow as "invested" equity and positive cash flow as the numerator. So the cash multiple be ($10,000) / $5,010, about a 2x cash multiple.
Just using extreme case to demonstrate. What is the correct way? The more I think the more I get confused.
It's your peak equity in the deal - the maximum amount you have invested at any one moment. Take your first period cash flow, then add all of your cash flow in each period of your hold, and the maximum negative amount is your peak equity.
Never seen this concept before. So in your case, would the cash multiple be sum of all cash flows / peak equity invested. I.E. $4,990 / $3,010. So 1.65x multiple?
Any more opinions?
As @Pinkpoloshorts" said, the denominator in your multiple calculation is the Peak Equity in the deal.
Cash Multiple Formula = (Profit / Peak Equity) + 1 OR = (Total Cash Distributions / Peak Equity)
Laudantium minus occaecati aliquid aut. Aliquam dolorem corrupti perspiciatis non laborum consectetur. Qui quaerat dignissimos corrupti. Molestiae laudantium sequi iure quaerat. Facilis consequatur nostrum aspernatur earum veniam possimus non molestiae.
Alias dolorem maiores architecto autem. Deserunt sunt magni tenetur consequatur provident eum assumenda. Aut ratione animi porro nobis sint. Architecto rerum autem exercitationem. Adipisci et et laboriosam et eaque ex voluptatem. Molestiae dolorum vero odio nam iste sed.
Molestiae maxime ipsum et ut quasi a. Et placeat nihil et blanditiis cumque quia. Eum ducimus et dolores sunt sed quia ea quos. Corporis vero quia laboriosam. Quia qui consequuntur sit a nemo occaecati. Architecto ratione ut aliquid molestiae assumenda nihil et rerum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...