CMBS Conduit to Buy Side Role (Equity)

How common is it for a CMBS analyst at a BB to lateral to a principal buy side shop? Obviously easier to go to a debt fund, but am curious about going to an fund that does either straight equity or a mix of debt and equity. Thanks.

4 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, transitioning from a CMBS conduit role at a BB to a principal buy-side equity role is challenging but not impossible. The likelihood depends on several factors:

  1. Branding and Complexity of Role: Analysts at BBs with strong branding and exposure to more complex products (e.g., mezzanine or CMBS) have a better chance of making the leap. Working in a sophisticated environment adds credibility and transferable skills.

  2. Skill Set: Equity-focused roles often require experience with tools like Argus and DCF modeling. If your current role doesn't provide this exposure, self-teaching or gaining these skills independently is crucial to bridge the gap.

  3. Networking and Positioning: Networking within the industry and positioning yourself as someone capable of handling equity-related responsibilities can significantly improve your chances. Highlighting transferable skills and showcasing your understanding of equity investments will be key.

  4. Challenges: Moving directly to equity at the VP/Director level is considered unlikely or difficult. However, transitioning earlier in your career or targeting roles that involve both debt and equity (e.g., mixed funds) can be more feasible.

In summary, while it's easier to transition to a debt fund, moving to a buy-side equity role is achievable with the right preparation, skill-building, and networking efforts.

Sources: CRE Lending Exit Opps?, https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/private-equity/going-from-mm-investment-bank-to-mega-fund?customgpt=1, Is CRE Debt Experience Pretty Enough for PE?, 2020: Real Estate Bonuses, Can GCM analyst recruit for PE?

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

This is entirely dependent on what the target landing needs.  I would say focus on retail, office, industrial shops because they are the more likely firms to utilize your direct skills. 

 

Laborum et quia ex voluptate exercitationem. Non iure natus est expedita amet. Autem officiis placeat dolorem eveniet. Voluptatem et libero natus laudantium quidem deleniti eum ea.

Qui occaecati consequuntur reiciendis quibusdam soluta nam. Nostrum totam minima est totam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (72) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”