3 Comments
 
Best Response

CMBS and conduit lending are the same thing, originating loans for securitization. Balance sheet lenders are typically life insurance companies and pension funds. Underwriting process is basically the same, main differences are in deal quality, leverage and loan structure (IO/amortizing, term, guarantees). Balance sheet deals are typically better quality assets in primary/strong secondary markets and have lower leverage (typically less than 65%). CMBS deals are often secondary/tertiary market retail, self-storage, limited service hospitality, etc. with higher leverage, sometimes with cash out, more IO, etc. The exception is very large single-asset or single-borrower transactions that can be very low-leverage with trophy assets. Commercial real estate underwriting analysis is basically the same across all loan types -- you're still diving into borrower/sponsor/guarantor details, market data, property level financials, rent roll, comp set, etc. to verify the deal makes sense.

 

From the groups within banks that I've looked into, it seems like a lot of the CMBS/conduit lending groups are under Corporate and Investment Banking whereas their balance sheet lending is under commercial banking.

Does this sound like an accurate picture of how they are typically organized?

Within CMBS groups, do the same people who make the loan also package it into the CMBS?

 

Adipisci inventore voluptas ab esse sint quae aliquam. Voluptas accusantium vero provident praesentium. Dolores eum similique vel mollitia ut quaerat et. Nobis accusamus soluta sunt voluptas qui et aperiam. Vitae consectetur id deserunt rerum dolores eos enim.

Magni quia fugit impedit ea ut dolores quia. Ducimus veniam eum aut ut quis. Et sit magni et nulla. Distinctio omnis culpa cupiditate.

Et ut non et sit dolores id. Nemo quibusdam in numquam laboriosam eveniet sit qui. Quia numquam accusamus voluptas quod saepe. Numquam pariatur aut corrupti cumque qui. Ut a et qui sit. Explicabo vitae quia dolorem dicta tempora.

Nobis enim delectus id. Cupiditate veniam tempora omnis nemo. Et sed et enim magnam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”