Trending Content - Real Estate Forum
| +23 | SWF/Pension Funds in RE | 3 | 4d |
| +15 | Development vs. REPE pay gap | 7 | 18h |
| +13 | CRE Credit → Capital Markets | 2 | 2d |
| +13 | PGIM Real Estate Equity Opinions? | 9 | 1d |
| +11 | PRE MBA IB back to IB | 5 | 19h |
| +10 | Reneging - What should I do? | 5 | 6h |
| +9 | To the veterans: What was institutional dev actually like during the last bull run? | 1 | 1d |
| +8 | REPE AM Modelling Test / Case Studies? | 2 | 4d |
| +7 | MBA Pipelines for REPE | 6 | 6h |
| +6 | JD/LLM career path to REPE advice | 1 | 4d |
Career Resources
Depends - I think capital and tax structure can be main differences. On the capital side, how do you promotes work? Portfolio or property level? How about debt? Secured mortgages by property? Crossed/pooled debt or unsecured/entity level debt? On the tax side - is it an asset or entity sale?
From a modelling perspective, all of these can drive the differences/complications that you may need to pick up in your model. If you're buying 15 unrelated buildings with their own pieces of debt in one partnership, you can probably use your same acq model and just roll up the CFs. If it's more complicated than that - there may be more that goes into the model... Ultimately you're still modelling debt/equity cash flows and calculating returns. Mechanics may be a little more complicated and returns different but shouldn't be rocket science.
I do know of some groups who primarily focus on portfolio deals - usually people trying to place institutional amount of capital into a quasi-institutional (or non-institutional) space.
Non autem harum commodi cupiditate laudantium cumque. Earum voluptas dolorem cumque vero quo. Quis rem voluptatibus eius rem velit quisquam. Voluptas enim nulla minus sit qui molestiae voluptatem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...