How to structure waterfall/promote when selling off part of deal at close?
Looking at a mixed use building and have brought a user who wants us to condo off the retail and sell to them concurrently with us closing on the overall deal. I am the GP and have an LP who is interested, but trying to figure out how to structure the waterfall where it makes sense as they aren't really calling that capital to sell off the retail and I want to be compensated for it. Maybe i'm overthinking it but appreciate any thoughts?
When structuring a waterfall/promote for a deal where part of the property is sold off at close (e.g., retail condo), the key is to align incentives between the GP and LP while ensuring fair compensation for the GP's efforts in securing and executing the retail sale. Based on the most helpful WSO content, here’s how you might approach it:
1. Separate the Retail Sale from the Main Deal Waterfall
2. Adjust the Capital Contributions
3. Incorporate a Promote for the Retail Sale
4. Reinvest or Distribute Retail Sale Proceeds
5. Consider a Fee for the GP
6. Example Waterfall Structure
Here’s a simplified example: - Retail Sale Proceeds: 1. LP receives return of any capital used for the retail portion. 2. GP receives a transaction fee (e.g., 1-2% of retail sale price). 3. Remaining profits are split (e.g., 70/30 to LP/GP). - Remaining Project: 1. LP receives return of capital and preferred return (e.g., 8-10%). 2. Profits are split based on standard hurdles (e.g., 70/30 to 15% IRR, 60/40 to 20% IRR, 50/50 thereafter).
7. Document Everything Clearly
By structuring the waterfall this way, you ensure the LP is fairly compensated for their capital, while the GP is rewarded for the additional value created by securing and executing the retail sale. If you're still unsure, consulting with a real estate attorney or financial advisor experienced in JV structures can help fine-tune the details.
Sources: Waterfall for long term hold, Best way to learn Real Estate Waterfalls?, https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/real-estate/waterfall-technical-question?customgpt=1
Could maybe agree on valuation before hand for the carve out and net the difference between that and the exit price on acquisition costs?
Feel like doing it through acq fee would be easier though.
Could you just transact on the retail yourself and have the LP only come in the mixed use?
You should take a dispo fee if you are bringing in the buyer and need to use the LPs money, then cram down the basis on the multifamily with the proceeds and return the capital upfront. Idk just an idea
Eos veniam architecto velit labore totam qui. Ullam architecto unde aut sint soluta consequatur totam. Voluptatem est sunt quod. Reiciendis nisi sint atque nesciunt sint. Laboriosam occaecati nulla debitis provident. Nobis ut officia eum reiciendis odio et soluta.
Aut deleniti expedita sunt ipsa veritatis qui nesciunt. Quibusdam pariatur ut voluptas et. Et blanditiis quis aut similique ut totam. Quaerat voluptatem et veniam excepturi. Repellat sit aliquam quod qui debitis. Temporibus itaque nesciunt et quae.
Et voluptas perspiciatis at officiis aperiam ut. Quaerat eveniet dolor explicabo voluptas laborum quidem excepturi.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...