Industrial at Sub 5 Cap ... how does that work?

A large REIT recently listed a 13 property portfolio located on the east coast.  It will likely trade at like a 4.5% cap, with one property sub 3.5% cap. 

How does one even underwrite something like this? Debt is unlikely to be accretive if you borrow at a 25 year AM.  Leases are somewhat below market, but not meaningfully so.  I'm struggling to understand how this makes financial sense for anyone to buy.  

5 Comments
 

lol welcome to the party. There's an embedded growth / safety assumption in that 4.5 cap. Debt capital markets are good for industrial, you can finance with positive leverage at a 4.5 cap still. It works if you think cap rates on industrial will stay low and you get growth, which I think on balance most investors do.

 
Most Helpful

Life Companies are lending full term interest-only in low to mid 2%s.  A large funds can borrow even cheaper money on an unsecured line of credit.  Leverage is definitely accretive.  Plus if you buy at a 4.5%, there is likely contractual annual rent bumps and market rent growth on upcoming lease expirations that drive up the return on cost to north of a 5.0% return on cost in mid / later years.  I haven't run the math but I'd bet that pencils high single digit / low double digit leveraged IRR.

 

I haven't seen the portfolio, but you need to think through past the initial cap rate. I've bought plenty of lower 4 cap deals - but the question is what is the cap rate in 3-5 years - what is the lease term. If it's a 4.0% cap rate but the lease term is 3 years, and you can than mark rents to market, it might become a 5.75% cap which you can than sell for a 5% cap, so you just made some good money. Depending on who the buyer is, it may not even be leveraged. Many core funds and life co's use minimal, if no, leverage. 

 

Ea eaque voluptas praesentium voluptatem. Nulla sed consectetur mollitia consequatur itaque distinctio. Modi eligendi at sint et accusamus quae. Adipisci laudantium corrupti quo eos iure.

Ut error et id sequi. Est minima qui consequatur et impedit. Iste quia et delectus numquam mollitia ut. Autem qui error corrupti repellat qui. Sint vel iure placeat porro. Maiores eaque culpa ullam error.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”