LIHTC Developer Comp

Anyone have info on what comp looks like working at a larger LIHTC developer as a project manager/development manager? At what point do you get ownership in deals? 

I work at a syndicator and interested in making the switch to the development side. I feel like there may be more upside in syndications if your not one of the top 2-3 guys at the developer, but I could be wrong.

Any insight is helpful. Thanks.

13 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, compensation for LIHTC developers often revolves around developer fees, management fees, and other assorted fees. For a project manager or development manager at a larger LIHTC developer, the comp structure can vary significantly depending on the company and market.

Ownership in deals, such as carried interest or equity, is less common in LIHTC development compared to market-rate developments. This is because LIHTC deals are structured differently, with most of the upside coming from developer fees rather than long-term cash flow or residual value. However, some developers may offer equity or a share of the developer fee as part of the compensation package, especially for senior roles or those directly involved in deal execution.

If you're considering switching from a syndicator to the development side, keep in mind that LIHTC developers typically focus on earning income through developer fees and minimizing equity contributions. While syndication might offer more upside in terms of long-term cash flow and residuals, development roles can provide stability and consistent income through fees.

For more detailed insights, you might want to explore threads discussing LIHTC developer fees and compensation structures.

Sources: Q&A: Affordable Housing Acquisitions, How do LIHTC developers make money?, Compensation Structure at the mid-management level in Corporate Development / Strategy / Finance, LIHTC during the next recession, Calling all people in Development

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 
Nibbz09

Interesting. Seems low. I assume that’s why every MN LIHTC developer was previously at Dominium lol. 

Any idea what a Senior associate/VP at Dominium or equivalent is pulling in? 

Last job posting us saw, was like 130 base. I assume maybe 160 all in after bonuses. They are known to be cheap though. Because they know they could churn and burn folks because I they know folks need the opportunity to learn. to be honest I really don’t see it getting better anytime soon. As you already know, Trump‘s tax cuts aren’t gonna make it more favorable for tax credit deals. As tax obligations will go down. So I would assume a huge uptick and pay anytime soon. Stay in syndication. Longer road to higher pay, but more predictable pay on the way there.

 
Most Helpful

I actually strongly disagree with this take.

First off, it's debatable whether Mr Trump has the ability to get another tax cut through.  His majority is razor thin and as we saw with this modern clown show iteration of the Republican Party, there isn't a lot of ability to whip members who care about fiscal responsibility.  I know, I know, you'll say that that was always a baldfaced lie and Republicans don't care about debt or deficits as long as they're the ones spending, and that's mostly true, but you do get the odd duck who actually has principles, and when your majority is what?  5 seats?  That's a tough nut to crack, preventing no more than 3 defections.

I'd argue you're just as likely to see a big increase in LIHTC, as we might get some meaningful change to the 50% test which would drastically boost production.  This is a bipartisan issue, and one that is extremely close to the hearts of most constituents, so I think you'll see real pressure on GOP lawmakers to actually address the issue now that they've managed to prevent Democrats from taking credit for it.  Simply put, this is not another boogeyman that most Republicans can campaign on, safe in the knowledge that most of their constituents will never really have to deal with the problem.  Housing prices are something that impacts people directly every day, and as we saw with this extremely modest bout of inflation, if the electorate thinks you are responsible for costing them a single penny, they'll punish you harshly.

Also, maybe this is a difference in experience, but pay is not tied to deal volume in development and your arguments against it are kind of contradictory.  If deals take a long time, then volume isn't as big an issue in the short term.  And you get paid for your expertise in this business, not in the number of deals you've closed.  That sounds more like a syndicator talking.  Which brings up the other bit of obvious hypocrisy - if there is less deal volume for developers, that means less deal volume for syndicators.  Why is one a negative and the other isn't?

 
Nibbz09

Interesting. Seems low. I assume that’s why every MN LIHTC developer was previously at Dominium lol. 

Any idea what a Senior associate/VP at Dominium or equivalent is pulling in? 

Every MN LIHTC developer was at Dominium because they're one of the biggest and most active affordable housing developers in the country.  People don't go there because they think they'll make a fortune as a 24 year old analyst.  They go because they'll get experience and then lateral to smaller, more regionally focused shops and get paid a lot more to be a senior person.  Or they'll start their own firm and do the same.  Or they'll stay at Dominium at get paid more.  You know, kind of like every job that ever existed.  

I would check Glassdoor for salary information

 

Depends on where you are.  I know LIHTC developers in NYC who start at about $100k all in, are probably in the 150-200 range after 3 years, and end up in the $300-400,000 range once they're more senior (10+).  And whatever carry gets dished out.  

That's probably on the high end, with salaries being lower in LCOL cities, but not unusual here.

 

Aut incidunt repellendus harum consectetur aperiam dicta ratione. Quos repudiandae ut quo quas. Fuga qui qui modi vel quam sit.

Consequatur praesentium quia dolorem enim debitis molestiae voluptatibus. Soluta consequatur molestias eius. Velit voluptas labore deleniti molestiae. Ipsa enim iure ut consequatur consequatur. Doloribus ratione eum dolor. Enim enim et corporis et.

Rerum et soluta consequatur facere aliquam. Architecto est eum impedit eligendi error non sequi eos. Magni est omnis eos ducimus necessitatibus.

Rerum nisi est corporis eligendi. Eos nesciunt ut aut aspernatur. Odio qui et hic nobis praesentium cupiditate tenetur.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”