LIHTC during the next recession

Can anybody in the industry comment on how they forecast the LIHTC market during the next recession. I feel like the last recession isn't the best comparison because banks' financial structures are stronger now. Any insights?

 

Fairly safe asset considering the upside of the lower tax-liability or the subsidized rental income from Uncle Sam. Depends on what the asset is....senior-oriented, HAP, and what percentage of the area median income is being utilized for rental rates. In terms of the next recession, there will be sufficient demand and somewhat limited supply for LIHTC properties. Class A and urban assets will be hit the hardest while the suburban Class B/C deals will be safe and ready for the exodus from the urban centers.

I've come across some LIHTC deals which are performing similar to conventional (non-affordable) properties with slightly higher overhead due to the administrative burden but significant upside in term of income and taxes.

 

So my concern is regarding demand during a recession, that tax liabilities drop and the pricing for the tax credits gets slammed so no new deals get made until the economy picks up. The asset itself is stable but I'm not sure how volatile the tax credit pricing/demand is

 

It depends. But here is a quick investor snapshot or at least how I would look at it:

If you have a LURA with a 5 year period remaining - maybe not the best idea during a recession, but you have the option of letting the LURA lapse and converting the asset into a conventional market rate deal. Given that the property is probably a Class B/C quality of construction, you have upside in value-add opportunities.

BUT if you have a LURA with a 15 year period remaining with an automatic extension for an additional 15 years - you are pretty safe during a recession. But downside is you are locked into the LIHTC and cannot convert to a conventional market rate deal if the market makes it more desirable post-recession (ie you're locked in for 30 years).

 

You are correct, that's what would happen. If you're a tax credit investor but due to a recession don't have a tax liability, then you're not buying credits. So TC pricing would take a hit in the short term. Bank CRA needs would provide a floor in certain markets, so you'd probably see the biggest impact to TC pricing in secondary/tertiary markets. But yes, less new syndications would get done.

 

Right, because you can pick and choose where you're going to be in the next recession. And it's so easy to get into one of the most complicated development sectors in a short period of time.

LIHTC is always a relatively safe bet. As a developer you make almost all your money up front on fees (limited lease up risk.) As an owner/investor your tenants are on the dole paying lower than market rents in most/all cases. Last time I checked the welfare machine didn't stop in 2008/9. It got bigger.

 

Can only speak for the tri-state market but that isn't true. Plenty of LIHTC deals got done in 2008/2009. And besides, banks are not the only buyers for tax credits - you get better pricing on the bank side because of the CRA credit, but there are plenty of other investors out there (oil & gas companies come to mind as previous large-scale buyers of LIHTCs) who want the tax breaks and the depreciation.

 

"Under law, the only investors eligible for Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) investments are large C corporations. As the financial markets deteriorated in the second half of 2008, so did the C corporations’ profits that are typically offset by tax credits, like the LIHTC. As a result, the market for LIHTCs was decimated. The development of new tax credit properties and rehabilitation activities for older affordable housing properties froze completely.

Congress took action in February 2009 to help restart the LIHTC market. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 created two gap-financing programs to help tax credit properties, which were ready to begin construction, get additional financing."

 
OnlineMoniker:
I saw forecasts that the tax cuts would only reduce LIHTC units by 10% over the next ten years, you feel like this is enough to avoid the asset class entirely?

The tax rate equates to a savings of 14% on marginal taxes. That, added with my belief that the affordable housing industry is predicated on bad economics (and is grossly wasteful), yeah, that’s enough for me. I’d also much rather be in an expansionary business rather than one that is contracting.

Array
 

I don't understand your comment? Yes, lower taxes = lower value of the credit, so there will be a slight decline in new syndications. But its not like production will drastically fall as the credits come from the Fed gov't and banks have a CRA need in certain markets. Plus, affordable housing is a hot topic right now and its hard to see that changing in the near term. I don't see how you could write it off as poor business moving forward? If anything the market is getting more efficient as more capital pours in searching for yield.

 
FrkWhite:
I don't understand your comment? Yes, lower taxes = lower value of the credit, so there will be a slight decline in new syndications. But its not like production will drastically fall as the credits come from the Fed gov't and banks have a CRA need in certain markets. Plus, affordable housing is a hot topic right now and its hard to see that changing in the near term. I don't see how you could write it off as poor business moving forward? If anything the market is getting more efficient as more capital pours in searching for yield.

Not just an indirect "lowering value of the credit"--literally, less actual need for the credit. We saw this happen in 2008/2009 when bank profits declined. When their profits declined their purchases of LIHTCs declined markedly.

LIHTCs aren't going away, but it's a contracting market with the lowering corporate income tax rate. Add in the fact that LIHTCs are very much cyclical with the economy (i.e. recession = much less demand) and I see it as a contracting market--less demand in a strong market (with lower tax rates) and markedly less demand during a recession.

Also, LIHTCs are an incredibly inefficient--and even immoral--way of developing housing (my boss is on the board of directors of a senior AH housing complex, which is getting LIHTCs to renovate their space; the developer is taking zero risk and is walking away with a $4M developer fee, paid for by the tax payers of the United States--it's grotesque). So I've got an economic problem with the industry and a moral problem with it.

Array
 
FrkWhite:
,...... Plus, affordable housing is a hot topic right now and its hard to see that changing in the near term. I don't see how you could write it off as poor business moving forward? If anything the market is getting more efficient as more capital pours in searching for yield......

Is there a distinct difference between Low Income and Affordable?

IMO, Affordable is for the recent grad, Working Class, and Low Middle Class Family that can't compete with the rising tide beneficiaries.

Low Income to me is section 8 or minimal financial prospects.

Correct me if I'm wrong, not my area of expertise by any stretch.

Based on those definitions, affordable housing is a huge concern, especially in the northeast, going forward.

 

Good night, everybody!!

Thông tin chi tiết xem thêm tại: https://tinbatdongsan247.net link text [url]https://tinbatdongsan247.net[/url] , [url=https://tinbatdongsan247.net]link text 2[/url]
 
Best Response

Nobis iste fugiat tempora aut. Rerum sed sapiente sunt eveniet quia omnis. Ipsum aut ut aspernatur culpa nostrum vitae non voluptas. Vel et sunt harum culpa autem est illum cum. Rerum ipsa nihil at velit enim delectus mollitia.

 

Nemo veritatis et nisi voluptate suscipit quia qui. Et aspernatur itaque alias beatae totam tempore nobis. Nulla magni ea quae illum neque earum laboriosam. In quam odit dolores ut iste.

Minima illo cumque labore et. Earum aperiam sit commodi aperiam voluptatem quia ab perspiciatis. Accusamus dignissimos illum sint quo dolorem. Deserunt ratione voluptas labore libero quis qui ut fuga.

Officia consequatur eum non quasi. Ut inventore ea et delectus qui. Ut dolore hic ad veniam occaecati nam. Et et tenetur eos consequatur nam natus. Qui doloremque unde aperiam officiis nihil commodi veniam. Molestias quidem nulla at perferendis fugit quibusdam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”