Mindset different between Core/Value+ and Ground-up development?
Currently in Ground-up / Opportunistic field.
Always feel that it's less underwriting-oriented than Core/Value+ strategy. Is that the case?
Currently in Ground-up / Opportunistic field.
Always feel that it's less underwriting-oriented than Core/Value+ strategy. Is that the case?
| +36 | Nadeem OUT At Blackstone - What Now? | 21 | 12h |
| +29 | Is there a market for this type of product? | 4 | 5d |
| +23 | Anyone Actually Outsourcing Underwriting / Asset Management? | 4 | 2d |
| +20 | SWF/Pension Funds in RE | 3 | 2d |
| +12 | CRE Credit → Capital Markets | 2 | 1d |
| +7 | REPE AM Modelling Test / Case Studies? | 2 | 2d |
| +6 | PRE MBA IB back to IB | 1 | 7h |
| +6 | How Much Do You Budget Annually for Pool Maintenance? | 1 | 3d |
| +6 | JD/LLM career path to REPE advice | 1 | 2d |
| +3 | REPE/Family Office Recruiters SFL | 1 | 9h |
Career Resources
Exactly the same orientation towards underwriting in both. As in, people who don't know what they're doing spend way too much time on the underwriting and way too little time on the execution, and the people who know what they're doing generally don't give a shit about the underwriting past a certain basic point.
The only difference is that the risk factors, and thus the returns, are different for both strategies.
Facts! Execution is the key to development. Getting through land use and zoning approvals, plats, tree mitigation, variances, etc.
Yes, totally agreed. My understanding is that in development execution (design, entitlement and budget control) is more important than UW once passing the initial stage.
However, I'm not familiar with Core / Value+ so still assume those strategies have less focus on execution, do they?
I wouldn’t say that they are not focused on execution, it’s just different. They are just more focused on increasing income and lowering expenses of an existing asset.
For example submetering units for utilities, new property management, upgrading finishes in units to justify rent increases, etc.
This falls more into the realm of asset management as opposed to ground-up development. Before “Rona” definitely had recruiters hitting me up to to do asset management. Some of those ground up development skills seem to be transferrable but don’t know about vice versa. This is from a multifamily perspective. Can’t speak for other asset classes.
Well, the initial stage is underwriting and after that it is all execution.
This! I always tell the younger investment guys. I give two shits about the 25 bps you are trying to solve for. We have a $5m contingency for "Off sites" without talking to anyone at the City. Now get your coat and boots on we have a meeting. But also. The smart guys at investment committee should pick up on holes in your budget to flag this kind of stuff. Your YOC or IRR models do not matter as much as knowing the big risk factors.
development and heavy value add, is much harder than core to underwrite. Core is very basic, in structure and modeling, and execution. Development is much more difficult in modeling/budgeting and execution. I learned so much more when I switched to a more development focused role.
If we’re just equating underwriting to modelling, core can often be more complex depending on the asset in question. A large office tower / complex with 20+ tenants requires a lot more detail / inputs etc than a 200 unit multifamily development.
If you’re also including DD as part of underwriting, development underwriting is significantly more DD intensive. Have to get comfortable with a much longer list of assumptions.
Voluptatem maxime maiores placeat pariatur necessitatibus fugit. Aut alias consequuntur et rem corrupti. Consequatur corporis ducimus aut nesciunt. Ut aspernatur exercitationem quo totam delectus ducimus. Error quia quia nemo praesentium voluptas est provident. Qui soluta corrupti quia veniam quidem et. Temporibus accusantium voluptas quisquam illo unde sunt voluptatem.
Quas et necessitatibus tenetur deserunt. Exercitationem velit sunt quasi perferendis officia nisi qui. Eum corrupti voluptatem ipsum. Natus omnis pariatur sed natus. At eos expedita aut. Rerum eum commodi eum nostrum est rem quisquam dolorem.
Et aperiam vitae quod dolores. Voluptatum totam non est autem pariatur. Reprehenderit voluptate voluptates dolor porro vitae enim dolor. A mollitia nesciunt quasi. Et natus omnis ipsa dolore a qui.
Perspiciatis ratione quia nihil doloribus. Nam voluptatum accusantium nulla modi porro ad reiciendis dolorem. Voluptas vel enim sint.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...