Private Equity - Fund Equity vs Deal Equity; Gross vs. Net Property Level Returns w/ Sub Line

I recently did and diligence request for a potential LP that asked questions differently than usual. This relates to peak equity, reinvesting cash flows, and using a subscription line in a closed end RE fund. If I take what I invest in a deal day one (x), take cash flow (y) to pay fund fees and expenses or distribute, and then fund more into that deal (z), my "invested equity" should be "x+z". I understand my net invested capital would be x-y+z, but that is somewhat irrelevant since management fees are paid on invested capital. Now to fund x, I put it on my subscription line and called the money later, also x. So if I take cash flow from a different deal and invested it (as z) into the deal, I have invested capital that is not from a capital call. So now I am in a situation where I have deal level invested equity of x+z and fund level equity of x. 

At the same time, lets say I funded the deal from my line in June, books close, and then call the equity in August. At 6.30 I will have invested equity in a deal that is from the subscription line. That is 1) ok, right? and 2) any property level returns should not include any sub line activity? What if I wait 6 months to call that equity? Is the property 100% levered? The acq guys are trying to sneak in using the sub line into their underwriting and I am pushing back but need more ammo. I have always been under the impression that subscription line activity should never be in deal level returns. 

Frankly, in past roles I was lucky to work with fabulous accountant that knew the fund world like the back of their hand. Now its a little bit different and I am getting different answers and there are (plenty) of times when looking at the fund level vs sum of the property level I cannot keep track of what is going on or what is right. 

Does anyone have any tips on how to manage this from a deal level and fund level perspective? Or how LPs digest this information when evaluating a manager? 

4 Comments

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (68) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”