Property assessments in NYC generally went down for commercial properties. Is it safe to adopt the reduced property taxes when trying to calculate for stabilized value?

Due to the impacts of Covid-19 on property values/cash flows, assessed values for commercial properties in NYC went significantly down more or less across the board. I will often come across a property that wasn't really even negatively impacted by Covid-19, like an industrial property in Brooklyn, and the assessed value may have gone down significantly.

I am wondering how people are handling this in their underwriting assumptions. Typically, you would just take the current taxes, make sure they are in-line with comparable properties, and then grow them out by 3% per year. But perhaps that would not be prudent now, especially for properties where the assessment reduction may have been a bit of an "overcorrection". Given the somewhat unique situation, how have investors generally been handling this issue?

2 Comments
 
Most Helpful

I would talk someone at a law firm or consultancy that specializes in NYC property tax to better understand how property tax works there. It's complicated... Yes, the assessments went down on aggregate more than after the financial crisis, but it's likely Dept. of finance will just jump them back up (hard to argue against when they were so generous with the drop). These professionals also tend to know people at DOF and will have color on where they think things are going.

Also, 3.0% trend is aggressive if you're underwriting any sort of value-add or pre-stabilized project. In office, it's typically like 25%-30% of trailing 2 year EGR depending on class, vintage, capital spend, building margin, etc. If you have a big pop in the top line, it will eventually show up in taxes. 

 

Officiis hic ex in voluptatem quia. Quam rerum qui quia commodi totam atque eum. Quo officiis autem facilis occaecati.

Officiis ut autem quia. Perferendis dolores at a architecto pariatur nulla quisquam. Quidem est fugiat provident nam ut assumenda et. Sint rerum est voluptas qui dicta.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”