RE Debt: Brokered vs Direct

For those of you that work on the debt side (debt funds, commercial banking, credit HFs), what percentage of your flow comes direct from sponsor vs are brokered processes? At mine it’s about 80% brokered (from JLL/CB/eastdil) and 20% direct to sponsor. Curious what the ratio is for others.

22 Comments
 
Most Helpful

We are closer to 50/50, but in my experience it generally has more to do with sponsor size that anything else.

Most of our brokered deals are from small to medium sized borrowers that need/want help running a process where the large institutional shops have dedicated financing staff in house and go direct.

Also, some borrowers start brokered but end up direct on repeat deals. We had a borrower that we did 10 deals in 2 years. The first was brokered and they liked us so much they came direct for the rest. If you can avoid paying a broker 35bps and instead call a lender, dupe some docs and close in 25 days, that is generally the easier route.

 

I’ll add about duping docs. It was eye opening for me to see how much business was won (and lost) over duplicating documents. Many lenders out there will do what they need to (drop rate, change structure, etc.) in order to win a deal and get a first set of documents negotiated with a high volume acquisition borrower. They understand that having those docs in place make them so much more competitive to win the next loan that comes around because all of a sudden, it’s cheaper and easier to close the deal. 

 

Not having to renegotiate every little point is huge, especially with the larger institutions. Quicker, less legal and they aren't as worried about getting x, y, or z because they already have it. Also why you have to be careful on the lending side what you give away, because it can bite you in the ass on the next deal.

 
mrcheese321

We are closer to 50/50, but in my experience it generally has more to do with sponsor size that anything else.

Most of our brokered deals are from small to medium sized borrowers that need/want help running a process where the large institutional shops have dedicated financing staff in house and go direct.

I’ve found this to be the case, but for the truly large loans (say $200mm+), more often than not they’re brokered. I’ve seen BX and their ilk who have a fairly built out capital markets team still engage eastdil / HFF / etc

 

Why do you think this is the case? Logically doesn't it make sense to go direct? Especially at that size I'm sure they have the established relationships and resources to execute.

 

When I was at a Life Co and did lending probably 90% of our deal flow, maybe even a bit more, was brokered. But many of the larger firms would come to us direct. At a certain scale, as also noted above, firms begin to bring debt capital markets in house. The smaller and midsize players would usually use a broker and the larger shops had one person (or even a team) dedicated just to DCM work. 

 

What do you define as "direct", the reason I ask this is some people don't consider capital brokers as brokers in this context because they don't drive deal flow from the property brokerages. 

 

This is simple but has always made a noticeable difference to my team - take the 15-20 minutes to ask about the firm and their teams experience as well as really telling the group about yourself and your firm. It’s amazing how so many people will just want to jump right into the “deal” and not even want to get to know the person they are talking to. My team would take a term sheet a few bps stiffer than another if it meant getting to deal with someone that actually gives a damn.

 

Sed voluptates qui molestiae sit. Aspernatur accusamus nobis architecto nemo et aut illum ratione. Eos consequatur exercitationem et. Dolorem voluptatum aperiam qui saepe corporis molestias.

Rerum excepturi quaerat repellat libero ut id et. Ea consequatur dolor accusantium illo autem inventore. Ut fuga vel voluptatem quis laudantium numquam.

Temporibus magnam voluptates totam aliquid harum consectetur et quia. Aperiam quas saepe in. Rem modi nihil quia quia sed repellat aut qui. Atque omnis labore vel iste earum incidunt. Quis aliquam ad voluptatibus odio provident.

 

Distinctio quia facilis adipisci explicabo. Dolor in placeat molestias dolore. Quia sit minima nam neque perferendis commodi. Corporis fuga est id necessitatibus et.

Ullam quam sed quaerat quia aperiam perspiciatis facilis eveniet. Rem molestiae saepe omnis omnis.

Autem nemo dolorum numquam suscipit. Expedita debitis qui ut velit ratione. Provident necessitatibus distinctio qui aliquid. Illum sunt iste voluptatem possimus assumenda.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (48) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (83) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”