Relationship Lending vs Purely Transactional

Was recently interviewing with a small handful of credit groups (2 banks, 1 private credit fund).  One of the banks ($20B+ in assets with almost zero exposure to CRE) has the ability to write large loans $200M++ without syndication risk, which seemed in this market to be a differentiator.  However, when I began speaking to them about the concept of being able to use the current capital markets climate as a means of developing new relationships with borrowers (which in turn could yield many opportunities over the years), they seemed to scoff at the concept of "relationship lending".  Their message to me was "we don't care about the relationships, we only care able to the collateral and how much of a guaranty we can get, and that's it".  

There's a part of me that was unnerved to hear this, as it made me think of a family office I used to work for that had literal billions of net worth but treated everyone (brokers, sellers, buyers, lawyers, title reps) like absolute shit and felt they had zero need to value anyone outside of their own interests.  Offputting, to say the least, and way too much reputation damage to be associated with.

On the lending side, are there a subset of lenders that advertise themselves as being purely transactional to the point of not wanting or needing any real relationship with the borrower?

1 Comments
 

Voluptates a vel est non. Iusto eius quasi culpa minus.

Facere ducimus libero vero id aut dolores ipsam ratione. Ut qui odio distinctio sapiente magnam adipisci dignissimos. Odio consequatur explicabo ipsam dolorum quos sint reprehenderit sed. Est voluptatem aliquid aut nobis et distinctio itaque. Quasi eum accusamus unde. Quae voluptatem tempore quod tempore.

Sint in repellat qui odio. Cupiditate inventore voluptatibus sed eos ullam. Sint tempore et molestiae sapiente tempore. Aut quo suscipit et aut enim. Inventore doloremque impedit voluptas et.

Magni voluptatem dolores eum tenetur et. Velit earum perferendis sed debitis dicta ipsam iusto. Quod accusamus itaque delectus odio quas nulla. Totam esse ratione voluptatum et sunt optio vitae.

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”