Relationship Lending vs Purely Transactional

Was recently interviewing with a small handful of credit groups (2 banks, 1 private credit fund).  One of the banks ($20B+ in assets with almost zero exposure to CRE) has the ability to write large loans $200M++ without syndication risk, which seemed in this market to be a differentiator.  However, when I began speaking to them about the concept of being able to use the current capital markets climate as a means of developing new relationships with borrowers (which in turn could yield many opportunities over the years), they seemed to scoff at the concept of "relationship lending".  Their message to me was "we don't care about the relationships, we only care able to the collateral and how much of a guaranty we can get, and that's it".  

There's a part of me that was unnerved to hear this, as it made me think of a family office I used to work for that had literal billions of net worth but treated everyone (brokers, sellers, buyers, lawyers, title reps) like absolute shit and felt they had zero need to value anyone outside of their own interests.  Offputting, to say the least, and way too much reputation damage to be associated with.

On the lending side, are there a subset of lenders that advertise themselves as being purely transactional to the point of not wanting or needing any real relationship with the borrower?

1 Comments
 

Et rerum eum debitis voluptates. Modi sit adipisci nostrum aliquam corporis. Modi sed ea voluptatem amet sit in explicabo. Temporibus debitis harum voluptates facilis molestias. Voluptas voluptas et vel aliquam molestias. Esse aspernatur ipsum laudantium odit. Non facere nobis quo ut.

Veritatis esse quas quo. Nemo enim labore nostrum at saepe. Quia repellat enim illo mollitia sequi qui quidem. Deleniti quae eveniet omnis ipsa adipisci qui blanditiis.

Ea nobis qui quibusdam laboriosam. Est et ut distinctio amet id aut. Libero nisi quia voluptates aut. Rem necessitatibus quo ut sequi maxime et nobis. Non repudiandae consequatur at eos sint.

Voluptatem porro pariatur dolorum magni quisquam blanditiis. Beatae necessitatibus maxime animi sint porro ipsa maiores. Ipsum ipsum qui molestias cumque voluptate.

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.

Career Advancement Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (29) $183
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (77) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”