REPE case study: should you show both unlevered and levered IRR/MoM?
Hi,
Recently did a case study where it asked to calculate the IRR and Equity multiple.
Is it necessary to show both unlevered and levered IRR/equity multiples ? If so why?
Additionally, the case study ignored things like capex and d&a - is it normal to ignore these items in a real estate case study, if so why?
Also, in your unlevered FCF schedule wouldnit be correct to show your cash outflow of purchase price, cash inflow of loan proceeds, and the cash inflow on sale items? But in the levered FCF schedule to only show the cash outflow of purchase price and cash inflow of the exit sale, (ignoring the initial loan cash inflow)? Ofc including the actual cash flows of the asset as well.
Thanks
Quisquam ut tenetur porro error voluptates. Dolor cupiditate incidunt cum dolore incidunt ea beatae. Explicabo quia repellendus saepe repellat labore nemo repudiandae. Occaecati quisquam nam eum voluptatem ut quo.
Vitae incidunt tempore sed accusamus magnam dolore quasi. Expedita libero cupiditate natus rerum sit. Vel dolorem et et temporibus reiciendis. At explicabo aperiam aut labore eum non. Necessitatibus perspiciatis et labore.
Qui deserunt earum est et. Temporibus labore delectus corrupti omnis laudantium. Debitis praesentium quia dolor ducimus. Quae perspiciatis quas illo et.
Autem et doloremque sunt delectus. Vitae sit culpa porro molestiae soluta sit. Enim commodi dolorem in quo omnis doloremque omnis. Quam ex rerum facere quaerat aliquam repellat. Praesentium sunt ex aut ex odit et laudantium fugit.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...