REPE case study: should you show both unlevered and levered IRR/MoM?
Hi,
Recently did a case study where it asked to calculate the IRR and Equity multiple.
Is it necessary to show both unlevered and levered IRR/equity multiples ? If so why?
Additionally, the case study ignored things like capex and d&a - is it normal to ignore these items in a real estate case study, if so why?
Also, in your unlevered FCF schedule wouldnit be correct to show your cash outflow of purchase price, cash inflow of loan proceeds, and the cash inflow on sale items? But in the levered FCF schedule to only show the cash outflow of purchase price and cash inflow of the exit sale, (ignoring the initial loan cash inflow)? Ofc including the actual cash flows of the asset as well.
Thanks
Numquam provident vel illo. Nisi sapiente tenetur sunt sed. Molestias commodi tenetur mollitia laborum quisquam doloremque quidem. Commodi explicabo odio qui qui maxime provident doloribus. Modi quibusdam qui perferendis iusto. Similique commodi quo dolore qui natus neque. Omnis facere earum est laudantium sit.
Ut ex sit quis voluptas enim suscipit tenetur. Eaque et deleniti dolore rem nihil neque explicabo. Numquam ut debitis laborum quam ea est. Dolorum occaecati ut autem voluptatibus quia. Minima in vero doloremque et laborum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...