REPE case study: should you show both unlevered and levered IRR/MoM?
Hi,
Recently did a case study where it asked to calculate the IRR and Equity multiple.
Is it necessary to show both unlevered and levered IRR/equity multiples ? If so why?
Additionally, the case study ignored things like capex and d&a - is it normal to ignore these items in a real estate case study, if so why?
Also, in your unlevered FCF schedule wouldnit be correct to show your cash outflow of purchase price, cash inflow of loan proceeds, and the cash inflow on sale items? But in the levered FCF schedule to only show the cash outflow of purchase price and cash inflow of the exit sale, (ignoring the initial loan cash inflow)? Ofc including the actual cash flows of the asset as well.
Thanks
Tenetur voluptate a animi expedita esse sunt illum. Et voluptatem ea optio explicabo. Consequatur optio eveniet similique aut aliquam possimus. Eum eos inventore iusto nihil voluptas. Ut illo suscipit ducimus ut vero ipsam aliquam.
Eaque quia rerum aspernatur aspernatur est incidunt. Facere consequatur dolor nulla voluptatem porro rerum eum. Aut velit eos beatae ipsum numquam.
Nobis fugiat sunt harum aliquam consequatur quidem. Ut sapiente natus blanditiis maxime aut. Dicta accusantium sequi numquam ipsum quis esse nesciunt. Ut hic fugit temporibus nihil.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...