Underwriting returns vs actual

I thought this might be an interesting survey to see what the actual IRR for an investment was, versus what we underwrote that investment at. I imagine that many of us are underwriting with aggressive assumptions in order to justify the investment, but most of the time those assumptions will not materialize because otherwise in a competitive market one would never be able to win a bid. At least this is what I am observing in my market.

14 Comments
 

I’ve found that our underwriting is always super conservative. 9 times out of 10 we’re crushing our UW returns for the sole reason that we’re super picky when it comes to acquisitions. If you only buy the needle in a haystack deals then the returns are always killer. If a team has to play with assumptions to ‘make the light turn green’ then are you really doing your fiduciary duty as an acquisition officer?

 

At a developer so a little different and longer time horizon than acquisitions but each everyone else saying you have to have conservative UW to be successful long term

For example we recently had an apartment deal stabilize and sell for around a 3.6% cap and we UW initially at 5.3% cap - blew it out of the water on that one but always need at least 50-75 bps spread between spot and exit cap rate to feel comfortable

 
Most Helpful

why do you think it sold for a 3.6% cap when you assumed a 5.3% in your underwriting?  cap rate compression has saved 80% of investors in the current cycle and with inflation or projected growth of ~6%, groups are forced to use 5-7% rent growth the first couple of years to buy deals.  Even worse, groups are using bridge debt.  Pretty soon, it will be multiple of revenue than NOI to buy multies.  The market is on fire and groups buying in the south east, phoenix and certain coastal markets are getting extremely aggressive to buy deals.  Not sure you can have 7% rent growth for the next 5 years and additional cap rate compression with a SHIT LOAD of new supply coming online across multi, SFR, and for sale product.  In today's world, everyone is underwriting high 3's or low 4's exit cap.... if you are using 5% cap, that means you are assuming crazy YoY rent growth or it's a wealth preservation play with only 2-6% IRR on paper.  I honestly don't know how some of the institional groups buying turn key assets are making money without making up BS in their presentation to limited partners who don't have a clue.

 

So there are a lot of different aspects to your post - I will try to break it up best I can

First - it was able to smell for a 3.6% cap just based on market dynamics and cap rate compression from when it was initially UW - however if this deal sold for a 5.3% cap we would have still hit our return thresholds - just a difference of making a 50% IRR compared to a 100%+ IRR (GP piece)

Second - I would have to disagree with you on cap rates not continuing to fall - there is so much capital chasing RE deals right and access to capital has always proved more important to cap rates than the Fed changing interest rates (in institutional RE at least, can’t comment on mom & pop and single family home purchases)

Definitely think in the next decade we could see a race to the bottom in cap rates and definitely room to move lower - if you just look at Europe a lot of deals in major cities over there sell for sub-2 caps. I still strongly believe you need to be UW at least a 50-75 bp buffer to spot cap rates in the current climate to feel conservative with your UW

 

Qui et itaque eum debitis exercitationem aut. Repellat adipisci qui rerum dolorem totam harum architecto. Vel ut quo consequatur minima fuga aut et cumque. Odio nobis odio repellat doloremque delectus veritatis. Perferendis est beatae necessitatibus modi minima. Qui provident consectetur illum quae.

Dolores quia hic distinctio deleniti rem. Nihil ullam est quam reprehenderit earum est. Iusto unde et repellat explicabo nostrum magni incidunt minus. Omnis et veniam aut laborum sit.

Est iste voluptates dolore et quod optio nam. Recusandae dolore alias itaque et dolor facere cumque quia.

Quia exercitationem voluptatum illum alias aut deleniti in. Delectus sit pariatur consequuntur aut ipsum. Facere aut dolorum quae. Rerum atque nisi magnam veniam. Voluptates similique aut voluptatem dolores molestias laborum. Et omnis suscipit libero ab totam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (65) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”