How do institutions/LPs look at returns from an unlevered IRR basis? I understand LPs generally target a net levered 6 to 9% for core, 9 to 11/12 for core plus, 13 to 16/17 for value add… and anything 18%+ for opportunistic, but are LPs also looking at it from an unlevered IRR basis? Are there similar goalposts for unlevered IRRs?
Thanks
| +48 | Major Decisions | 8 | 18m | |
| +31 | Yes Another Comp Thread | 29 | 3h | |
| +29 | LP coming into deal at higher land basis. How to model returns to GP? | 10 | 4h | |
| +28 | Niche down to an operator or stay an allocator | 9 | 8h | |
| +24 | Target Return for Spec SFR Development? | 8 | 2d | |
| +24 | Breaking into CRE late 20s | 7 | 1d | |
| +20 | Doom Loop or Creative Urban Reemergence? | 3 | 3d | |
| +19 | Self Storage ECRI | 8 | 11h | |
| +18 | 3 Hour Condo/Rental Excel Test - What Can Be Expected | 2 | 1d | |
| +17 | What do you RE folks think? | 7 | 5d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Yes there are. Generally you’ll hear institutional investment sales brokers quoting 5 year and 10 year discount rates. Those will generally be the goal posts. As leverage is effectively financial engineering, and one firm may receive different debt quotes than another (leading to different return projections), unlevered IRR is actually how you should look at every deal. For instance, if a value add unlevered deal generally produces a 7-9% 10 year IRR, and you found one that produced a 10-11% 10 year IRR-you may have just found a mispricing and you should do the deal. However, your debt quote may only get you to an 17% levered IRR but your competitor gets a better quote getting them to a 18.5% IRR. Leverage is engineering. You should always look at unlevered.
Spot on.
Thanks! This is super helpful. Would you say unlevered returns for core/core+ is generally 4 to 6%? Value-add 7 to 9%? And anything above is opportunistic?
It's been getting higher, and that is really just a function of debt getting more expensive
Yes, it's often referred to as "Project Level Returns". In other words it tells you the actual projects return on a stand-alone basis, not accounting for gains from leverage or promote waterfalls.
It's a very important metric as you want to make sure your unlevered returns demonstrate a healthy spread to your debt interest rate, otherwise you're at risk of experiencing negative leverage and in extreme cases, default.
I think Project Level Returns are the levered returns prior to the waterfall. From my experience it’s usually still called the Unlevered Returns/ or Unlevered Project Level Returns. If it’s called the Project Level Returns by itself it’s usually the Levered. Agree on the rest of your points though
Thanks everyone for your input. My question still stands, what are the “goalposts” for what unlevered IRRs should be per core, core+, value-add, and opportunistic?
Thank you!
Rem minus praesentium repellat eos provident in. Reiciendis dolores iure recusandae hic quibusdam illum molestias. Qui tempora incidunt eos ex aliquid. Et repudiandae cum nihil voluptatem natus ipsa quis. Aspernatur eligendi commodi voluptas quam eaque nihil voluptatem aut. Illo quis animi iure qui et.
Dolorem eos iure perferendis incidunt corporis quos beatae. Esse placeat quas sequi eveniet non. Eveniet ea voluptates natus iusto. Dolore sit neque quis ducimus est non ut. Provident atque reiciendis quos rerum laborum. Est veritatis quaerat aut praesentium nam nihil nam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...