16 Comments
 

Tides Equities and similar "value-add bro" companies have faced significant challenges in the rate hike era. Based on the most helpful WSO content, here's a breakdown of their situation:

  1. Interest Rate Impact:

    • Tides Equities operates in a leveraged asset class, and their strategy heavily relied on low interest rates. With rates climbing, their debt service costs have surged. For example, they had a 2-year initial term at SOFR+425, which, even with a 3% rate cap, resulted in a 7.25% current rate and a $2M debt service at the cap. This has strained their financials.
  2. Risky Strategies:

    • Their approach depended on aggressive rent growth and liquidity, which worked well in a strong market. However, as the market shifted post-2021, their reliance on bridge lending and high leverage (70-80% LTC financing) exposed them to significant risks. Many of their deals now face potential covenant breaches or refinancing challenges.
  3. Desperation and Capital Calls:

    • Reports suggest that Tides has been listing numerous deals, a move often associated with desperate sellers. They are also pressuring investors with capital calls, warning that failing to contribute more money could result in losing their existing investments.
  4. Operational Concerns:

    • Criticism has been directed at their operational practices, with claims that their "renovation" plans were superficial and aimed at flipping properties quickly rather than creating long-term value. This has led to properties falling into disrepair and accruing large preferred equity pieces.
  5. Future Outlook:

    • Many believe Tides Equities and similar firms are at risk of handing back keys on numerous deals as rate caps burn off and balloon payments become due. Their reliance on fees over equity stakes has also been highlighted, with some suggesting their model was unsustainable in a rising rate environment.

In summary, the rate hike era has exposed the vulnerabilities of Tides Equities and other value-add firms that relied on aggressive leverage and short-term strategies. Their future remains uncertain, with many predicting significant fallout in the coming years.

Sources: Tides Equities?, Tides Equities?

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Tides is still around, they have a zombie portfolio that will likely all go through some sort of foreclosure/capital event in the next 2-3 years. I've seen them look at a few deals, but finding the equity appears to be difficult. They'll likely continue to exist, but whether they'll convince someone to partner with them anything at scale remains to be seen.

 

VP in RE - Res

Tides is still around, they have a zombie portfolio that will likely all go through some sort of foreclosure/capital event in the next 2-3 years. I've seen them look at a few deals, but finding the equity appears to be difficult. They'll likely continue to exist, but whether they'll convince someone to partner with them anything at scale remains to be seen.

Over the past 12-18 months I’ve heard of them tying up a deal or two, trying to raise $$ during diligence, and failing so they had to drop. Heard their price was aggressive on one deal, so perhaps it was that, but haven’t seen any evidence that anyone institutional will give them LP dollars again.

 

Maybe, a bunch of people lost A LOT of money in the GFC and came back from it, and they really just need one fund/bank/insurance company to trust them to start the next iteration of Tides. It's also not like they were alone in getting caught with their pants down on interest rates and there are some capital allocators I've talked to that are willing to give a bit of a pass on that. 

Would I invest money with them? Definitely not, but that doesn't mean others may not see opportunity.

 

VP in RE - Res

Maybe, a bunch of people lost A LOT of money in the GFC and came back from it, and they really just need one fund/bank/insurance company to trust them to start the next iteration of Tides. It's also not like they were alone in getting caught with their pants down on interest rates and there are some capital allocators I've talked to that are willing to give a bit of a pass on that. 

Would I invest money with them? Definitely not, but that doesn't mean others may not see opportunity.

No one is investing money with them again they lost that much 

 
Most Helpful

Maybe, a bunch of people lost A LOT of money in the GFC and came back from it

This is sadly very true.  However, I think a lot of those people had long, successful careers before going bust*.

It's also not like they were alone in getting caught with their pants down on interest rates and there are some capital allocators I've talked to that are willing to give a bit of a pass on that. 

Yeah but I think there comes a point where you apply the smell test.  Did every deal get caught out?  What is the physical condition of the properties like - if many of the assets are falling apart, then it might be the case that future lenders/partners think "there wasn't much of a business here in the first place except betting on rates staying low."   Did they actually put their own capital into deals to save them, or are they just playing chicken with their lenders?

I don't think it's just as easy as saying "other people came back from big losses."  Harry Macklowe had decades of success in the most competitive, cutthroat market in the country.  It's a little easier to justify a comeback when you can point to that, and to the sheer scale of what brought you down.  

*We can debate how much we should call anyone successful before they survive a downturn - everyone makes money when things are going well and they all point to their track record when things below up, but if all that "success" was on paper and never realized, then I would argue they never had a successful deal in the first place

 

Molestiae assumenda aliquam ratione sint aut tenetur exercitationem. Laboriosam iste laborum omnis debitis aliquid autem. Aut animi harum deleniti earum ea suscipit reiciendis. Ducimus necessitatibus ratione sint laudantium dolores nisi reiciendis vel.

In sint minima hic illo et veniam. Sint dignissimos saepe dolorum optio ut expedita perferendis. Nihil blanditiis magnam nobis aut tempore. Eveniet ut perspiciatis hic.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”