Valuing a leasehold interest in an acquisition

Looking at acquiring the leasehold interest of an office building. Regarding the valuation, do buyers generally (i) place a cap rate on the NOI, incorporating ground lease payments into opex, or (ii) place a cap rate on the NOI, excluding ground lease payments from opex, and then separately value the ground lease with a cap rate that might be a bit compressed from the leasehold uses (given the subordination benefit the ground lease gets over the leasehold uses), and reducing the fee simple value by the separately valued leased fee value?

Would appreciate input from the guys who have direct experience with this.

5 Comments
 
Best Response

I've primarily used DCF analysis using our desired rate of return to determine the gross transaction proceeds available. Then back out your transaction costs and capital improvements to determine an acquisition price. I'm in a bit of a niche asset class that doesn't see too many leasehold transactions, and certainly not enough to determine an appropriate cap rate spread between fee simple vs 30-, 50-, 70-year remaining leasehold, but we'll take a look at the implied cap rate as a sanity check. Also, any unique terms of the lease agreement (e.g. leasing restrictions), which are likely more prevalent if you're leasing from the public sector, may influence whether a "market" cap rate is appropriate for the transaction.

I assume option "i" that you referenced is a common approach for leases with a substantial remaining term and in assets and markets that see enough leasehold transaction volume. Would be interested to hear if option "ii" is an approach regularly used by anybody here.

 

Definitely agree that funds take the same approach you mentioned to determine a leasehold purchase price, however, you still need to assume a sale price down the road, most likely using one of the methods above (yes, you can run a dcf for the next buyer, but that's just a pain).

I'm inclined to think most people go with option "i", but curious to see if anyone has used "ii" in the past, as it could have a meaningful impact in a low cap rate market with high land/ground lease values. For future comments, lets just assume its a long-term ground lease with 5-10% escalations every 3/5 years tied to an inflation index and no market resets.

 
"REAcquisitionsnyc"

Definitely agree that funds take the same approach you mentioned to determine a leasehold purchase price, however, you still need to assume a sale price down the road, most likely using one of the methods above (yes, you can run a dcf for the next buyer, but that's just a pain).

I'm inclined to think most people go with option "i", but curious to see if anyone has used "ii" in the past, as it could have a meaningful impact in a low cap rate market with high land/ground lease values. For future comments, lets just assume its a long-term ground lease with 5-10% escalations every 3/5 years tied to an inflation index and no market resets.

My boss used method ii to value the leasehold interest of one of our properties when negotiating buying out the partner.

Array
 

Corporis nesciunt cum nihil ratione repellendus. Voluptatem voluptatibus iste magnam voluptatem. Suscipit blanditiis in aliquid ad necessitatibus quibusdam. Possimus et consequuntur sit illo.

Ullam qui expedita sapiente velit pariatur. Sit et quos hic fugiat aut. Voluptatem minus quos fuga nisi qui quis dolorum iste. Qui voluptatem minus delectus ut dolores. Itaque ad itaque blanditiis beatae quia nostrum esse fugiat.

Doloremque illum laudantium sed sed molestias sapiente nam necessitatibus. Minus pariatur et in eveniet. Quaerat ex et culpa non et provident. Est dolorum dolores voluptatem accusantium doloribus unde.

Array

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.9%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (53) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (15) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”