Warehouse lines (back leverage)

Quick question relating to debt funds that employ back leverage.  Assuming it’s 50% leveraged, 50MM from warehouse line and 50MM from the debt funds own capital. 
 

100MM total loan commitment with a point in and point out.  Does the debt fund typically have to share those fees with the warehouse lender?  Because if not, it’s effectively 2 points in and 2 out based on their actual capital. 

4 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, when a debt fund employs back leverage using a warehouse line, the fees (such as points in and points out) are typically retained by the debt fund and not shared with the warehouse lender. The warehouse lender's compensation generally comes from the interest rate charged on the borrowed amount, not from the origination or exit fees associated with the loans.

In your example, if the debt fund is leveraging 50% of the $100MM loan commitment with $50MM from the warehouse line and $50MM from its own capital, the fund would effectively earn 2 points in and 2 points out on its $50MM equity contribution. This leverage amplifies the fund's returns, as the fees are calculated on the total loan amount ($100MM), but the fund only deploys half of that amount in equity. The warehouse lender's role is to provide the cheaper debt, not to participate in the fee structure.

Sources: https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/real-estate/debt-funds-repo-lines-vs-warehouse-lines-vs-subscription-facilities?customgpt=1, Fund-Level Revolvers, Debt Funds - Levering loans?, What returns have you achieved from co-investing in your fund?, Debt Fund Modeling in REPE?

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 
Most Helpful

There are usually facility fees on warehouse lines along with unused fees for committed capital from the warehouse provider that’s not being drawn down. I haven’t seen additional origination fees from warehouse providers on new deals, however I’ve seen several charge extension or modification fees on individual deals when there are changes, but it was usually a small portion of the modification fee we as the debt fund were charging

 

Quia minima ea non necessitatibus molestiae. Nemo assumenda sunt minima nisi impedit. Voluptatibus commodi porro quia vitae. Cum debitis ducimus sed dolore ad. Distinctio accusamus sequi ea accusamus in delectus.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”