Why use Equity Value multiples for REITs?

I'm trying to understand the basics of valuation metrics used within the RE space, and from what I understand, the most used are:

1) NAV - NOI + Assets - Liabilities (all marked to market), essentially the entire value of the firm/REIT 2) Cap Rates - mostly used for asset level analysis and can be applied to NOI to figure out a fair value for property

Valuation metrics: 1) Price/NAV 2) Price/FFO 3) ???

My questions are:

1) From what I understand, the typical way to value RE firms at the property level would be DCF, Income approach (NOI/Cap Rate), Expense approach (rebuilding entire asset today) and at the corporate level would be (NAV) as well as some equity value calculations for public firms (Price/NAV, Price/FFO)

Why do we use Equity Value in these valuation metrics? Are there more I'm missing? Is NAV = Enterprise Value for typical corporate companies? I'm just used to seeing so many typical valuation metrics such as EV/Revenue, EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT, and so forth that I'm having a hard time conceptualizing the RE counterparts.

2 Comments
 
Best Response

SS Revenue Growth is another key metric beyond NAV that analysts consider. I recently read a piece that discussed cash flow multiples and cash flow growth potentially taking emphasis over NAV and SS Rev due to the increasing number of investors looking at REITs with real estate's new classification. Price/AFFO multiples are also another item we look at to gauge how expensive REITs are relative to one another as AFFO is the best measure of REIT cashflow (FFO - recurring CapEx + adjustment for non-cash straight line rent). REITs are so depreciation intensive and generate nearly all of their cash flow on the assets they own (the real estate) making the value of the underlying portfolio assets the most applicable metric to evaluate them on. Furthermore, private market real estate is evaluated via cap rates and net operating income at the asset level, enabling a quick comparison of a REIT's geographic holdings with private market cap rates to gauge a discount or premium to NAV the REIT trades at.

 

Alias minus et sit voluptatem. Nihil occaecati provident voluptatem amet eum. Nam et expedita omnis non illo nihil amet. Et ea autem corporis ullam. Ratione praesentium aspernatur similique itaque dolorem similique natus.

Eligendi rerum dolor saepe necessitatibus enim. Reprehenderit enim sapiente ipsam reprehenderit. Sunt vel eaque adipisci.

Perferendis aliquid molestias omnis vero incidunt fugiat. Unde ad dolores molestiae. Provident molestias a aliquam laborum sequi deserunt quia. Perferendis voluptatem dolor magni aliquam. Et delectus suscipit ipsum culpa aliquid qui vel.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”