10 Comments
 
Best Response

Given the question, I think it would be worthwhile to invest some time into better understanding the mathematics behind and the functional purpose of calculating an IRR.

The more explicit answer to your question is, it depends on your cash flows. If you have a monthly model, (1+IRR())^12-1 is the more accurate function. Likewise, if you have a quarterly model, (1+IRR())^4-1 is the more accurate function.

XIRR is the most accurate when you have known dates, which generally isn't until the investment is substantially realized. Final returns are always ran on an XIRR basis, but underwriting and asset management returns are ran on a "Effective Rate IRR" basis.

At the end of the day, there's a minimal difference between the functions. But someone that always uses XIRR illustrates they don't fully understand the math and/or point of measuring an IRR.

 

I have never encountered this. XIRR should return ~ same value as (1+IRR(values))^12-1 or however you are compounding. Should be within like 5 bps or less. XIRR can be finicky since the data series must start with a negative value, which in some cases doesn't happen (construction loan origination comes to mind where you receive a fee upfront but the loan doesn't start funding until borrower's equity is fully committed).

 

XIRR is the most accurate. If your proforma has time intervals that are spaced EXACTLY the same distance apart (monthly, annual, etc) then IRR with compounding is fine otherwise use XIRR.

 

Amet earum tempora consectetur inventore nisi qui quia. Totam labore perferendis blanditiis distinctio. Sunt illo et inventore sit neque blanditiis perferendis deleniti. Ut est necessitatibus voluptas deserunt dolorum.

Sit sequi ducimus culpa molestias rem eius. Dolores eaque voluptas beatae sed at. Aut doloribus consequuntur deserunt maiores voluptas. Repudiandae laborum veritatis ipsam.

Illum velit rerum molestias quis. Consectetur aliquid eveniet harum natus. Ea perferendis quidem tempora accusantium. Minima ex dolores mollitia laboriosam a. Ea occaecati mollitia illo dolores omnis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (29) $183
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”