10 Comments
 
Best Response

Given the question, I think it would be worthwhile to invest some time into better understanding the mathematics behind and the functional purpose of calculating an IRR.

The more explicit answer to your question is, it depends on your cash flows. If you have a monthly model, (1+IRR())^12-1 is the more accurate function. Likewise, if you have a quarterly model, (1+IRR())^4-1 is the more accurate function.

XIRR is the most accurate when you have known dates, which generally isn't until the investment is substantially realized. Final returns are always ran on an XIRR basis, but underwriting and asset management returns are ran on a "Effective Rate IRR" basis.

At the end of the day, there's a minimal difference between the functions. But someone that always uses XIRR illustrates they don't fully understand the math and/or point of measuring an IRR.

 

I have never encountered this. XIRR should return ~ same value as (1+IRR(values))^12-1 or however you are compounding. Should be within like 5 bps or less. XIRR can be finicky since the data series must start with a negative value, which in some cases doesn't happen (construction loan origination comes to mind where you receive a fee upfront but the loan doesn't start funding until borrower's equity is fully committed).

 

XIRR is the most accurate. If your proforma has time intervals that are spaced EXACTLY the same distance apart (monthly, annual, etc) then IRR with compounding is fine otherwise use XIRR.

 

Voluptatum ab modi sunt magnam incidunt. Quibusdam voluptatibus eaque aut consequatur doloribus aut. Est reiciendis fugiat iste omnis alias possimus voluptatem incidunt.

Assumenda nulla et magnam qui vero. Assumenda dicta provident commodi totam non non. Natus id et qui est.

Consequuntur molestiae officiis nihil maiores eos sed voluptas. Dolorem aut reiciendis ratione et eligendi sit.

Recusandae odit neque occaecati molestiae. Beatae non sit eveniet rerum aut at. Vel eum quis debitis illo deleniti vitae repudiandae. Assumenda molestiae doloribus ratione distinctio assumenda. Aperiam explicabo et quia corporis rem laudantium quaerat.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”