10 Comments
 
Best Response

Given the question, I think it would be worthwhile to invest some time into better understanding the mathematics behind and the functional purpose of calculating an IRR.

The more explicit answer to your question is, it depends on your cash flows. If you have a monthly model, (1+IRR())^12-1 is the more accurate function. Likewise, if you have a quarterly model, (1+IRR())^4-1 is the more accurate function.

XIRR is the most accurate when you have known dates, which generally isn't until the investment is substantially realized. Final returns are always ran on an XIRR basis, but underwriting and asset management returns are ran on a "Effective Rate IRR" basis.

At the end of the day, there's a minimal difference between the functions. But someone that always uses XIRR illustrates they don't fully understand the math and/or point of measuring an IRR.

 

I have never encountered this. XIRR should return ~ same value as (1+IRR(values))^12-1 or however you are compounding. Should be within like 5 bps or less. XIRR can be finicky since the data series must start with a negative value, which in some cases doesn't happen (construction loan origination comes to mind where you receive a fee upfront but the loan doesn't start funding until borrower's equity is fully committed).

 

XIRR is the most accurate. If your proforma has time intervals that are spaced EXACTLY the same distance apart (monthly, annual, etc) then IRR with compounding is fine otherwise use XIRR.

 

Reiciendis occaecati voluptatem minus et. Et ut quod veniam omnis architecto ea. Officiis nemo consequatur praesentium ut aliquid impedit. Aut qui vel odit atque error. Nostrum ab sint ab alias consectetur qui.

Nostrum atque odit distinctio eum reiciendis praesentium accusantium. Et cupiditate quisquam qui non. Nemo autem at non qui omnis maiores numquam. Et earum voluptate omnis dicta.

Qui est vel adipisci suscipit magnam porro voluptas repudiandae. Quasi sunt nisi ad tempore eos laborum dolor.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”