Got off the waitlist at both schools, was wondering which one is better for recruiting. I personally want to go to Claremont and start my career at a West Coast office, but some family friends have been telling me that West Coast banking is on the decline and everyone's headed back to NYC, which Cornell seems to be better at placing. Is it worth going to Claremont McKenna for a better undergraduate experience and some debt (~140k), or suffer through four years of upstate New York and graduate debt-free? Would I have better opportunities at Claremont McKenna since there are less kids total gunning for IB jobs?
Trending Content - Business School and GMAT Forum
Career Resources
Go to Cornell.
Going in debt to reject an ivy league school is insane.
Cornell sends kids to west coast IF they show interest, which most don't because NYC is close.
Cornell without question.
120k+ for a lateral school? Doesn't make much sense. If you're interested in the West Coast, start getting internships/relevant experience as soon as possible and you'll be able to get there.
I work in tech in SF and there are tons of east coasters/ivy leaguers.
Is it worth forgoing the quality of life offered by a SoCal school for the name-brand of Cornell?
Ipsum quia iusto qui repellat neque velit. Tenetur est molestiae veritatis omnis et non ipsa. Ex nesciunt ut pariatur ut qui. Nihil eum iste veritatis omnis sit ea.
Laboriosam aut ex nihil mollitia. Quis accusantium quod ea non. Et dolor aut provident exercitationem. Dolores doloribus laboriosam sed animi voluptatibus quod et et. Eligendi quia ut consequuntur commodi a. Aperiam consequuntur impedit consequatur fugit in consequuntur neque.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...