Does School Prestige Still Matter (As Much)

Coming from a target i see a lot of good talent land MM IB

Some of my friends at state schools (non targets) pulled top EBs.

Is school prestige as important as it once was or has it gone to the wayside (i understand for PE it still is really important) ?

I.e. does coming from princeton(top target) vs cornell/berkeley/ucla (low/semi target) matter as much nowadays?

3 Comments
 
Most Helpful

I had this thought myself, and since have always thought about recruiting outcomes as decently random and falling along a normal distribution. If you have the best outcome on the right and the worst outcome on the left, then the majority of the distribution will fall somewhere in the middle with some percentage on either side.

I believe that if you go to a target school, have a high GPA, network, and prep as best you can, you only shift the average outcome slightly to the right (toward a more optimal outcome). What this means is that it is MORE LIKELY that you get a better outcome, but not guaranteed by any means. 

My point is that when you see these target school kids at MMs and non-target school kids at EBs, this is not because prestige has gone out the wayside. It is because you are handpicking the extremes on either end of the normal distribution (although I would argue that landing at a MM even at a target is not the a lower outcome, not getting a job or landing in some inferior role is). These kids got unlucky or lucky respectively, in that maybe their average expected outcome was better or worse than what ended up actually happening for them in this one life they were given.

That being said, if your question is whether this is a yes/no question: Can target kids end up at MMs (or worse), and can non-target kids end up at EBs (or better)? The answer is yes. There is no hard rule that these kids are ineligible for these roles just based on the school they attend. 

My point is that it's just the luck of their one outcome relative to how they increased or decreased their average expected outcome based on networking, prep, etc

 

Sapiente sit rerum autem sit. Eveniet sapiente voluptatibus exercitationem tempore voluptatum aliquid. Maiores pariatur iusto commodi autem. Esse fugit maiores nam quos.

Id et quod perferendis explicabo. Vero assumenda et ut autem. Ea error iste nihil laudantium. Facere et tenetur sunt aut laudantium est soluta. Et et repellendus dolores enim dolorem.

Sint ea deleniti quo maxime et inventore adipisci. Aperiam occaecati nihil ea quos. Ut voluptatem quibusdam et fuga qui dolorum. Odit ad et et dolorum nemo. Dolorum maxime quae voluptatibus eos blanditiis reiciendis nostrum. Autem reprehenderit quod distinctio quam sed corporis sint laborum. Ut est in quibusdam dolor excepturi voluptatem aperiam.

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (66) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”