HBS Round 1 - Submit an application?

Did anybody else submit an application for HBS round 1? Just sent mine in last night.

I thought I would feel relieved to be done with the written portion, but instead I feel strangely empty. It's going to be a tough few weeks waiting for interviews.

78 Comments
 

Sounds like you'll get a serious look based purely on work experience. What were your 'hooks' or extracurriculars?

I am permanently behind on PMs, it's not personal.
 
anonanonanon

submitted last night too. agreed - not as much of a relief as i was hoping. got 4 more to complete in R1. this whole process is a crap shoot

It's really not much of a crap shoot. If you have a prestigious/selective job which indicates you have the potential to make a lot of money down the road, give some of it back to the school, and help place new graduates in said prestigious/selective job, then the top tier schools will want you.

MBA admissions is all about what you can do for them.

 
monty09

sent in mine. Background is on here somewhere and both my recommendations are HBS alum who are investors in my firm.

Do you think that these recommendations will make a huge difference?

I'm talking about liquid. Rich enough to have your own jet. Rich enough not to waste time. Fifty, a hundred million dollars, buddy. A player. Or nothing. See my Blog & AMA
 

Tossed in my application, too. Good luck to everyone applying!

Couple questions to the group:

  • What is the general sentiment among your former colleagues/classmates who are applying this cycle? (A few people I know were unable to make HBS' R1 deadline due to trouble with the essay, etc.)
  • Are you all/your networks applying broadly during R1, or breaking up applications into R1 and R2?
 

Most of the PE and hedge fund guys i know applied round 1. This is just conjecture, but I think the round 1 applicant pool is a bit stronger than round 2.

 
CrimJC

Tossed in my application, too. Good luck to everyone applying!

Couple questions to the group:

- What is the general sentiment among your former colleagues/classmates who are applying this cycle? (A few people I know were unable to make HBS' R1 deadline due to trouble with the essay, etc.)
- Are you all/your networks applying broadly during R1, or breaking up applications into R1 and R2?

I am tossing a late hail Mary at Stanford

 

720, 3.4, research. I founded a "pour one out for Brady" pledge drive during orientation that raised money for "good times" awareness. I hope that the 4 cases of room temperature Keystone Light were enough to put me into an admittance type situation. Someone's life is about to change forever.

 
wannabeaballerI founded a "pour one out for Brady" pledge drive during orientation that raised money for "good times" awareness. I hope that the 4 cases of room temperature Keystone Light were enough to put me into an admittance type situation. Someone's life is about to change forever.

Lol, I hope plenty of bunny rabbit like behavior was involved, so that personal transformations could be had by the less fortunate.

 

How many of you guys have used admissions consultants to prepare your application?

I'm talking about liquid. Rich enough to have your own jet. Rich enough not to waste time. Fifty, a hundred million dollars, buddy. A player. Or nothing. See my Blog & AMA
 

From my experience, 80% of what you get from them is available for free on their blogs, sites, or forums like these. They advertise their services so heavily that they give away too much info on what they provide. As long as you're a) a coherent writer and b) have dedicated some serious mental energy to reflecting on your experiences and goals, combining the two in written form is a stimulating exercise -- challenging but doable.

Personally, I don't see the allure of paying thousands of dollars for a service like that when so many admissions committees are really streamlining the process. With HBS in particular, it's clear that the essays, recommendations, and interview are the critical components you really need to execute on.

Your grades, GMAT, and work experience are history at this point. Given their single optional essay, I really think they are now using the written application as a means of winnowing the candidates down to a number manageable enough to interview.

If you wanted to pay for a consultant, that would be the point. Don't do it before getting an interview. Once you have one scheduled, then use a consultant (like Sandy) who will help you understand all that you don't understand about what the adcom wants to find out in those 30 precious minutes.

Then again, that's just me. Your mileage may vary.

I am permanently behind on PMs, it's not personal.
 

While I agree with most of what you said, I think that having someone look at you at your experience etc and maybe point out weaknesses that they see based on their experience working with 100s of applicants beforehand, may be useful. Personally, I could probably point out one or two weak points in my profile that would handicap my application, but I am sure that I would not be able to do as good of a jobs as Sandy for example.

I'm talking about liquid. Rich enough to have your own jet. Rich enough not to waste time. Fifty, a hundred million dollars, buddy. A player. Or nothing. See my Blog & AMA
 
APAE

From my experience, 80% of what you get from them is available for free on their blogs, sites, or forums like these. .

I would disagree with you here. Although you reference your "experience", it doesn't sound like you've ever used one. Anyway, that's not the point. I will share my experience of goign with one this cycle and why I think it's important.

On that note, I went with a consultant. I consider myself as knowledgeable as anyone about the application process, having basically read everything there is to read that's out there. I took the GMAT a year and a half ago, and since have been very deeply involved in trying to become the most well-read applicant possible. I also did a ton of free consultations to try to find the best consultant, and completley agree that of the ~10 I talked to, maybe two gave me anything of value, and only one really impressed me. I was quite close to going into it alone because of how unimpressed I was by so many of the consultants. Where I really disagree with your sentiments are that the good ones can draw things out of you that you didn't even realize were part of your story, while also coaching you on how to improve your situation.

I have not gotten in yet. However, I think it's insane to discount the essays. MAYBE at HBS this year, the essay means less. To me, that's a huge maybe. As you said, it's a weed out process to figure out who gets an interview. Well holy shit, that's just about the most important part of your application then, assuming you meet the general academic/work experience criteria. And that's just HBS. When you get down to the next few schools (Wharton/CBS/Sloan/Whoever else), there is no question that essays are enormously important.

If you're not a 10/10 applicant, and have some sort of weakness in your profile, you damn well better be interesting. AdCom's have to sell the applications they read to the greater committee. Moreover, with so many people on this site that have gone IBD-->PE, a population that has been hit pretty hard at HBS the last few years, you'd think that you guys want to differentiate yourselves even more from the pool of equally qualified finance, white, males applying.

I know so many Target, 3.8, 740+, BB-->PE guys that have gone 0fer at HBS/GSB, many of whom didn't get into Wharton either. Those guys should get in if they execute right, but way too many don't.

I didn't really touch on my experience, and will share more if anyone is interested.

 

I agree more or less with this although there are a few consultants who are actually solid. By and large, I think the value add of consultants is dubious at best, and lot of their "statistics" such as "80% of our clients get into one of their top 3 choices!" is bogus.

I think there are 2 groups that can generally benefit from a consultant. First group is those who are non-native English speakers and need serious help with essays. Second group is those who have impeccable credentials and just need a form of "insurance," to ensure that they don't screw up in the essays.

The 2 or 3 most important parts of the application: work experience, GMAT, and GPA, are set in stone, and there is nothing that consultants can do to mitigate that. Although essays, in particular the career goals/why school X essay, are important, if one has done enough research and has trusted friends who can provide feedback, I don't think consultants are worth it.

Of course, many will disagree.

 

Really? i never tried any of them, so I wouldn't know. However, isn't Sandy for example charging $1500 for everything? That shouldn't be too much for some looking to got for an MBA, no?

I'm talking about liquid. Rich enough to have your own jet. Rich enough not to waste time. Fifty, a hundred million dollars, buddy. A player. Or nothing. See my Blog & AMA
 
Best Response

All good points, and agree with most of what you said. Definitely think that the vast majority of consultants are pretty cookie cutter (could get the same thing from friends that go to bschool). And yes, their stats are insanely unreliable.

I'll add what I think is a major caveat though: work experience can also be VERY much how you frame it for the AdCom. If you went from GS --> KKR, then it's probably pretty obvious to them. However, if you're a slightly non-standard career applicant (and I don't mean completely "non-traditional"), your framing of your career story can be huge for explaining everything. On top of that, if you want to somehow differentiate your finance background from the others, they can absolutely help you with this.

Additionally, for me, I have found the most helpful part has been explaining my EC's. The strongest part of my app is probably my community involvement/college EC's, and I found it a lot more difficult to intertwine those into my essays than career stories. My consultant has been huge for this.

Last, and this will sound ridiculous for a few thousand dollars, is tracking to deadlines. I'm about to finish my fifth round one application. I would not have reached this goal if it weren't for having weekly calls to work towards. I'm married and my wife is a 2nd year MBA student, so it's pretty important for me to know our future by December for location purposes. I had to get my shit done round 1, while managing a ~70 hour a week workload and a wedding last month.

On top of everything else, you're about to spend $120k on school. $4k just really didn't bother that much when I looked at it as part of the greater investment.

 

You're right, I didn't use one. As I said, your mileage may vary, and it really sounds like you got out of it what you wanted. I hope it works out for you.

I am permanently behind on PMs, it's not personal.
 

In for HBS R1, doing Stanford R1 as well. My background is on the other thread but in short - 1 year BB banking + 2 years at an HF today (will be 3 when entering), GMAT 770 and GPA >3.95 from a target. A bit weak on ECs post-college but have a nice narrative in the essays (especially Stanford - I actually like Essay 1)

 

Did anyone who applied NOT visit the school or NOT talk with members of the adcom, such as at an MBA tour? Reasoning? And for those that did, what was the feedback like? Neutral?

Array
 

I applied there and did not make a visit to campus. I went to an event with Dee and I got the feeling that she is more interested in very unique students or students at firms that seem to be major feeders (e.g., select consulting and megafund groups). They have so many people apply and have the ability to be so selective that just because I have IB and PE on my resume, I am nothing special. If you think about the lower ranked programs, they seem to do anything to talk to someone with MBB, BB IB, PE, target background, etc. but they probably can't be as selective and do not as many applicants from those backgrounds. I tried to do my diligence on the school with former students should I get an interview to show that I have a plan on what I am going to do when I get into the school. I have been extremely impressed by some of the students that I have talked to and not so much by others (I met a guy with 2 years of consulting that got in because his group sends kids there every year and he was going straight back to the group. It's great he is at a good firm, but it wasn't a particularly compelling story).

 

Sounds like the usual mixed bag of many ultra qualified students with others who are strong MBA candidates in general, yet by comparison don't necessarily put stars in the adcom's eyes.

Array
 

I was deferred as well, and I don't think it really says much about our specific chances. Sure statistically speaking, Rd2 will have more competitive applicants (when you include round 1 hold overs), but it will as usual come down to what they think of each candidate and why they chose to defer them. Its possible you were deferred strictly because of a time issue (In which case you're a strong candidate with solid chances)...its also equally possible it was because they had some lingering doubts. Either way, Jan/Feb is too far away to fray your nerves about it now.

 

Quod laborum vitae nisi voluptate et. Rerum quia a facere recusandae itaque autem quis. Consequuntur ut quis ipsum aut sint iusto natus. Minima recusandae dolores et. Ipsam ea ducimus qui. Dignissimos illo repudiandae voluptates ducimus qui omnis alias.

 

Et neque impedit sint cum iusto dolores. Nisi non assumenda est placeat.

Voluptas qui suscipit eum eaque voluptas. Ex quo at repudiandae ut distinctio. Ut nostrum dolores nihil nisi quia cum neque. Id enim unde consequatur totam magnam optio omnis deserunt.

Qui alias aut rerum. Repellat ea debitis voluptatem est perferendis. Eos qui eveniet sit maxime praesentium totam.

If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses - Henry Ford
 

Omnis nihil quia voluptates recusandae dolor ut. Optio omnis laborum autem veritatis non reiciendis. Qui in aspernatur qui asperiores aut quidem. Debitis magni architecto ad et.

Eaque illo qui dolore eius nihil. Qui id a debitis ut. Ullam odio porro sunt fugit et possimus. Dolores adipisci aut voluptate rerum. Enim necessitatibus maxime ea deserunt optio non impedit temporibus. Magnam est illum quaerat velit sunt voluptatem odio. Similique voluptas vel quisquam odit rem omnis.

Quia quo ut recusandae esse. Provident nemo eius ipsam saepe ea in. Qui est quo aliquid consequatur est in.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (65) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”