Lazard PEI vs Evercore Energy Transition (MBA Associate)
Hello!
I’m an incoming MBA Associate deciding between Lazard’s Power, Energy & Infrastructure (PEI) group in NYC and Evercore’s Energy Transition group.
Would appreciate thoughts on:
- Street reputation & deal flow
- Culture & hours at Lazard PEI vs Evercore ET
- MBA associate compensation (base/bonus/trajectory)
- Exits after 2–3 years (infra PE, energy/transition investing, strategics)
Mostly trying to understand differences at the margin since both are top platforms.
Thanks in advance.
Based on the most helpful WSO content, here's a breakdown of your query:
1. Street Reputation & Deal Flow
Evercore Energy Transition (ET): Evercore's Energy Transition group is newer but rapidly growing, leveraging Evercore's strong M&A platform. It focuses on the evolving energy landscape, including renewables, decarbonization, and other transition-related sectors. Evercore is known for its exceptional deal flow and dominance in M&A advisory, often outpacing competitors in terms of deal volume and value.
Key Difference: Lazard PEI has a more established reputation in traditional infrastructure and energy, while Evercore ET is positioned as a leader in the growing energy transition space.
2. Culture & Hours
Evercore ET: Evercore is often praised for its relatively better culture compared to other elite boutiques. The Energy Transition group, being newer, may have a more dynamic and entrepreneurial vibe. However, Evercore's high deal flow can lead to long hours, especially for associates.
Key Difference: Evercore may offer a slightly more collaborative and modern culture, while Lazard PEI might feel more traditional but still professional.
3. MBA Associate Compensation
Trajectory: Both firms offer strong compensation growth, but Evercore's rapid expansion and market dominance in M&A may provide slightly better upward mobility in terms of pay.
Key Difference: Evercore likely edges out Lazard in total compensation, especially in bonuses.
4. Exits After 2–3 Years
Evercore ET: Excellent exits into energy transition-focused investing, renewables, and decarbonization funds. The group's focus on cutting-edge sectors positions associates well for roles in growth equity, private equity, and strategic roles in the energy transition space.
Key Difference: Lazard PEI is better for traditional infra PE and energy roles, while Evercore ET is ideal for those targeting energy transition and renewables-focused opportunities.
Final Thoughts
Both are top-tier platforms, and your decision should hinge on your long-term career goals: - If you're more interested in traditional infrastructure and energy, Lazard PEI is the better fit. - If you're passionate about renewables, decarbonization, and the future of energy, Evercore ET offers a more specialized and forward-looking platform.
Good luck with your decision—both options are stellar!
Sources: EB Comparisons, Evercore v.s. Lazard v.s. PJT Partners
Dolor dolorum aspernatur excepturi et consequatur aut amet. Eum sed sunt est asperiores.
Voluptatem qui perspiciatis fugit asperiores voluptatem. Ea nobis odit sint earum. Id alias ullam molestiae perspiciatis laborum eligendi. In nihil quae animi facere velit unde.
Ab soluta ea voluptatem qui dolor esse. Totam ea velit doloribus rerum voluptates. Qui laudantium eveniet ipsum quia magnam hic voluptas.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...