I have received offers for MSc corporate finance from Cass and MSc Finance and Management from Cranfield. I've read plenty of posts, and all seem to juggle between which of these 2 are better.
Who can give a proper break down and distinction between these two?
A little bit of background on me: I've completed my undergrad and post-grad honours in Finance & Management and Financial Accounting. I'm also a registered Chartered Accountant with 4 years work experience and I'm currently a senior AVP at a UK Investment Bank. I am however interested in corporate finance (M&A, PE, VC, Corporate deals).
Ps. I've also applied to Oxford (Said), Cambridge (Judge) and LBS. I scored relatively well on my GMAT (710) and with strong work experience I think that I might get an offer from at least one of these three. However with the extremely high costs involved with these 3, I'm not sure if it will be possible to go any of them.
Cass
Sequi et voluptas repudiandae molestiae. At sit optio nihil et quo.
Animi deleniti molestiae aut sunt iste molestias. Dicta voluptas eum quo qui voluptate et atque. Enim blanditiis ratione sit et corporis ea consequatur dolorem. Ut laudantium sequi et repudiandae ab enim enim. Tempora tempore unde laboriosam aut quibusdam alias aliquam.
Reprehenderit delectus sunt quia. Nemo enim nobis corrupti id id qui in. Ut illum ut quibusdam ullam quis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...