RX IB Seniors: What Do You Think of Law School?
Incoming RX IB analyst and really enjoyed my time last summer and while trying not to get ahead of myself, think I would want to stay long term. I've been thinking about law school as I approach training, as it's something I've always been moderately interested in.
Do you think law school provides an edge to seniors?
I'll list some factors I'm considering. Let me know if you think I'm thinking of this the right way
Edge in having both skillsets: From what I could tell on my deals in my short time, the MDs seemed to have one skillset and the lawyers had another. Is having both of those skillsets in one person valuable? Would law school even provide the requisite skillset, or would I have to practice?
Cost/opportunity cost: Fortunate to be in a position where my law school would be paid for. However, I'm aware of the salary that I'd be missing out on. Also, progression early could be slower, etc.
Brand improvement: Although I'm at one of the big RX shops, I wonder if getting a top law school will help me with opportunities down the line. Not from a super crazy undergrad (UVA/UCLA type).
Enjoyment: I did mock trial etc. in high school and enjoyed it. I really love numbers, but I also really enjoy the legal chess of RX too. I know not every deal is innovating a beautiful LME, but it still interests me. I love learning in general, too.
Thanks for any advice, thoughts you have. I genuinely do appreciate it.
Based on the most helpful WSO content, here’s a breakdown of your considerations and whether law school might be a good move for you as an incoming RX IB analyst:
1. Edge in Having Both Skillsets
2. Cost/Opportunity Cost
3. Brand Improvement
4. Enjoyment
Final Thoughts
Ultimately, the decision comes down to your long-term career aspirations and how much value you place on the personal fulfillment of attending law school versus the tangible benefits it might bring to your RX IB career.
Sources: Talk me out of law school (HYS law), Big Law to Investment Banking -- Thoughts?, Banking to Law?, Rx Law to Rx Banking or Buyside, Finance vs. Law
not necessarily - mike kramer of ducera only has a bachelor’s degree from a complete non-target state school, and the man’s an absolute RX beast!
I don't think law school in itself is necessarily that useful since you might only encounter a couple classes on bankruptcy or restructuring topics.
Having a working understanding of credit agreements, the bankruptcy process, and some key tax, litigation, and corporate finance law topics is necessary to be competent as a rx banker. You pick up a lot of those things working alongside lawyers in ways that are challenging to achieve in a law school experience, particularly in hotter / fast moving areas like liability management.
However, these are also not the most important part of your job, which is still financial analysis and networking / client management.
I considered this path semi-seriously but I think law school should really be thought as for future career lawyers vs. bankers, especially if your annual opportunity cost is $300k+ per year after your analyst program.
Cum cum earum modi odio deleniti deserunt cupiditate. Omnis perferendis itaque rerum officiis vel quis.
Eius animi deleniti sunt commodi deleniti perferendis modi. Et qui natus atque aut animi adipisci. Impedit voluptatem et suscipit consequatur reprehenderit id. Labore voluptas harum consequuntur neque voluptas voluptatem magnam corporis. Repellat voluptatem quae voluptatem ut veritatis eligendi nobis. Et mollitia sit temporibus tempora mollitia.
Sit tenetur est ipsum impedit sint. Non neque voluptatum aliquid eos. Deleniti placeat deleniti et.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...