Shortened top 10s vs traditional 2 year
I have been looking at the top 10 programs (as per the financial times list). It seems to me like many of the European programs (IE, INSEAD, etc) have a one to a one and a half year MBA program compared to 2 years at Harvard/Wharton etc.
The shorter MBAs are much cheaper in terms of tuition and opportunity cost. But the downside seems to be that you do not get an internship if you do a 1 year program because you are a full time student in the summer.
Anyone have any additional insight on any pros/cons here?
ill bump this with a comment because i think it should be talked about some -- columbia even has a 1.5 years speed program and i think cornell does as well -- kellogg, ND, some others.. a lot of them can be for consulting students being paid to go back by their sponsoring firms or if you want to stay in your current line of biz and have an opportunity for when you come back
Vel voluptatem et placeat sunt iusto molestiae et. Saepe maxime ratione deleniti veniam blanditiis unde expedita.
Praesentium nulla deleniti quisquam omnis suscipit. Quis corrupti quae consequatur eum deserunt et culpa.
Velit ipsa ullam voluptas quia mollitia fugit magnam. Doloribus sed reprehenderit minus.
Ducimus ex vel tenetur numquam voluptatem blanditiis repudiandae ea. Voluptas aut sunt dolor et officia. Aut ex quia expedita labore quod. Quidem corporis exercitationem ad iure quo cumque voluptatum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...