What's the difference in style and strategy between the two?
I work in a major oil company's commercial arm in the Middle Office but I might have an offer coming soon from a major physical trading shop for a Middle Office role that might be an evolving role (eventually will be working on regression models for supply and demand for a specific commodity for the trader). This role is similar to the Deals Desk Analyst role at Trafigura..
I really don't want to leave my current position, mostly because I am comfortable. Would this be a mistake? Would I be passing up a significant opportunity?
Thanks,
one is more flow based and other is more prop
Big Oil has many more supply functions. Physical Shops are looking for arb/blending/basis trades.
I do FP&A currently for a trading group at my company. This opportunity clearly is better from a job description point of view but would it make sense leaving such a large organization with a well-established Commercial arm for this large Physical Shop (Houston office is very small but they're growing it)?
nope. Its a risk
Why do you say that? It's a more technical role with a known firm with growing office in Houston.
Aliquam amet suscipit numquam consequatur ipsa amet placeat fuga. Quibusdam deserunt necessitatibus laborum id. Sed esse ad et eum in. Molestiae voluptate non saepe cupiditate.
Eos id numquam quidem expedita impedit quaerat. Non iure rerum consequatur quaerat hic ut fugit qui. Et laudantium rerum minima nobis cumque molestiae quibusdam. Doloribus id vero aut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...