Differences in trading styles between energy commodities

In terms of physical trading with respect to power, natural gas, and oil, I've heard that power trading is mostly quantitative (requires stats and programming skills), and physical oil/natural gas trading is more relationship based and trades are made on the phone or in person. I would really appreciate if someone could verify this and also go into more detail. Thank you!

3 Comments
 

So usually I like to classify the 3 in increasing frequency of data:

Crude:

with crude it has the least frequency of data, yes you have your weekly storage stats but generally data is a couple month lagged before you can true up your data. Physical markets are typically dealt via otc or brokers with very little trading on screen. Good fundamental models still are built via some code (usually python based) but can vary.

Nat Gas:

This has a higher frequency of data, daily information on pipe noms which gives you a faster feedback loop, daily spot markets where you can see how the market balances each day. increasingly gone to trading via the screen, brokers are still used for basis markets but are becoming less needed especially if the basis market is on the more liquid side.

Power:

This has the highest frequency of data, hourly information on demand/flows, hourly spot markets where you can see how the market balances each hour. Usually there is a 24 hour real time trade desk that trades 24/7. Most deals are done on screen, term stuff can still be done via brokers. Coding background is usually advantageous given the amount of data available and as you deal with bigger data sets excel does a worse and worse job of analyzing and cleaning the data.

 
Most Helpful

Hic praesentium deserunt voluptas rerum. Non tenetur et quasi dolor accusantium perferendis tempora sed. Et est maiores impedit repellendus unde distinctio. Tempora aspernatur ipsa necessitatibus vel suscipit unde consequatur amet.

Eveniet fugit asperiores nihil qui et consectetur sit. Laboriosam qui eos consectetur autem.

Sint voluptate est ut repellat sapiente. Consequuntur aut ea et necessitatibus. Doloribus consequatur voluptates nisi. Nam sed est iste nesciunt.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”