Differences in trading styles between energy commodities

In terms of physical trading with respect to power, natural gas, and oil, I've heard that power trading is mostly quantitative (requires stats and programming skills), and physical oil/natural gas trading is more relationship based and trades are made on the phone or in person. I would really appreciate if someone could verify this and also go into more detail. Thank you!

3 Comments
 

So usually I like to classify the 3 in increasing frequency of data:

Crude:

with crude it has the least frequency of data, yes you have your weekly storage stats but generally data is a couple month lagged before you can true up your data. Physical markets are typically dealt via otc or brokers with very little trading on screen. Good fundamental models still are built via some code (usually python based) but can vary.

Nat Gas:

This has a higher frequency of data, daily information on pipe noms which gives you a faster feedback loop, daily spot markets where you can see how the market balances each day. increasingly gone to trading via the screen, brokers are still used for basis markets but are becoming less needed especially if the basis market is on the more liquid side.

Power:

This has the highest frequency of data, hourly information on demand/flows, hourly spot markets where you can see how the market balances each hour. Usually there is a 24 hour real time trade desk that trades 24/7. Most deals are done on screen, term stuff can still be done via brokers. Coding background is usually advantageous given the amount of data available and as you deal with bigger data sets excel does a worse and worse job of analyzing and cleaning the data.

 
Most Helpful

Et asperiores neque qui est laboriosam tenetur quia blanditiis. Autem sequi maiores perspiciatis sed maiores. Id aut aut sit perferendis magnam optio consequatur.

Error accusamus est et. Qui alias numquam possimus non aut. Non autem atque et id.

Corrupti consequatur consequatur a rerum et ex. Nesciunt aut aspernatur aspernatur doloribus. Error qui in quas fugit nihil dolore animi aliquid. Qui cum id unde ad. Eligendi culpa voluptatem similique.

Rem eos qui voluptatem non omnis aliquid dolores. Consequatur id adipisci et ut modi in. Inventore modi natus fuga deleniti et dolore.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 03 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (51) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (26) $182
  • Intern/Summer Associate (15) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”