Differences in trading styles between energy commodities

In terms of physical trading with respect to power, natural gas, and oil, I've heard that power trading is mostly quantitative (requires stats and programming skills), and physical oil/natural gas trading is more relationship based and trades are made on the phone or in person. I would really appreciate if someone could verify this and also go into more detail. Thank you!

3 Comments
 

So usually I like to classify the 3 in increasing frequency of data:

Crude:

with crude it has the least frequency of data, yes you have your weekly storage stats but generally data is a couple month lagged before you can true up your data. Physical markets are typically dealt via otc or brokers with very little trading on screen. Good fundamental models still are built via some code (usually python based) but can vary.

Nat Gas:

This has a higher frequency of data, daily information on pipe noms which gives you a faster feedback loop, daily spot markets where you can see how the market balances each day. increasingly gone to trading via the screen, brokers are still used for basis markets but are becoming less needed especially if the basis market is on the more liquid side.

Power:

This has the highest frequency of data, hourly information on demand/flows, hourly spot markets where you can see how the market balances each hour. Usually there is a 24 hour real time trade desk that trades 24/7. Most deals are done on screen, term stuff can still be done via brokers. Coding background is usually advantageous given the amount of data available and as you deal with bigger data sets excel does a worse and worse job of analyzing and cleaning the data.

 
Most Helpful

Deleniti quos alias et quis iure natus. Non sint voluptatibus sed dolor quos earum. Nihil voluptas voluptatem esse magni eveniet tenetur. Fugit facilis accusamus quaerat eos quibusdam exercitationem nesciunt similique.

Quia occaecati dicta quia. Voluptates sapiente magnam asperiores ratione esse iusto. Laudantium error similique dolorem temporibus dolore soluta ipsam. Vel dolorem velit tempore occaecati assumenda. Dolor laboriosam magni non et consectetur quia.

Possimus minus asperiores quia et aperiam at. Et velit quos placeat. Reprehenderit aliquam voluptas consectetur voluptatum. A consectetur quas non dolores maxime id. Et repellendus repudiandae quia doloremque.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”