Fresh CS Ph.D. Offers: BB S&T vs. Prop vs. Silicon Valley

I'm a fresh CS Ph.D. from a top 5. I have three offers:

1) BB S&T quant. Not as a desk strategist, but on a longer-term modeling group that supports traders and desk strats. Offer is $105 base + $45 sign-on + variable annual bonus (no guaranteed minimum). 2) Stat arb at a top-10 prop shop. On a small team of a couple Ph.D.s and a manager. Offer is $80 + variable annual bonus (guaranteed minimum $40). 3) Modeling at a large Silicon Valley tech firm. Best offer is $190 annual + $50 sign-on. The $190 is $140 base + RSU package worth $50 annually at current valuations.

Any obvious conclusions? Things that matter most to me:

1) Total comp over short, medium and long haul. 2) Work hours.

Any thoughts on how the three options stack up along these dimensions? The BB and prop higher-ups are tight-lipped on bonus expectations. I've seen plenty of numbers on WSO, but none specifically for quants, and I'm guessing they're lower. I tried asking about bonuses on the popular quant forums online but got voted off the island quickly.

17 Comments
 

not another quant guy......

shrugs

whatever

The world will learn

Obviously each offer is getting you paid so just do the one you want to do the most.

The one who does not fall, does not stand up
 

LOL -- guess I haven't learned! I'm aware WSO isn't for quants. I tried this on a popular Internet forum geared towards quants, but they downvoted me quickly and eventually deleted my post. I see a lot more hard numbers on WSO, so I thought I'd give it a go here.

 
Best Response

Thanks oldmansacks! The tech company is a large Internet site and the work involves algorithms for ranking search results, targeting ads, revenue-optimizing various parameters of the site, etc.. This was my best of three SV offers -- the two I turned down were $190 total without a sign-on, and $170 total + $10 sign-on.

You gave me a good idea of BB hours -- those are certainly more than tech. Any idea on whether the bonuses would make it worth it? What's a reasonable expectation as a % of base? Remember: non-desk quant, S&T, BB, doing models to support the desk strats and traders. They're not divulging any historicals or averages, but claim that over the long haul I'll make more there than in tech. Still, the immediate gap makes me wonder if the break-even isn't 5 or 10 years out.

 
tomfeylThanks oldmansacks! The tech company is a large Internet site and the work involves algorithms for ranking search results, targeting ads, revenue-optimizing various parameters of the site, etc.. This was my best of three SV offers -- the two I turned down were $190 total without a sign-on, and $170 total + $10 sign-on.

You gave me a good idea of BB hours -- those are certainly more than tech. Any idea on whether the bonuses would make it worth it? What's a reasonable expectation as a % of base? Remember: non-desk quant, S&T, BB, doing models to support the desk strats and traders. They're not divulging any historicals or averages, but claim that over the long haul I'll make more there than in tech. Still, the immediate gap makes me wonder if the break-even isn't 5 or 10 years out.

Dude, take number 3. Tech work is so much more interesting than the crap you would be doing in S&T.

I am not cocky, I am confident, and when you tell me I am the best it is a compliment. -Styles P
 

Dude, have you worked in S&T before? With your education, the work may not be that interesting. I know a guy who uses his Ph. D. in computational biology to fill in excel sheets at DE Shaw. I know another who does fairly simple database management stuff at a BB.

I would go with offer number 3.

I am not cocky, I am confident, and when you tell me I am the best it is a compliment. -Styles P
 

i'm someone who has no interest in tech or startups, but even for me, #3 seems like the obvious choice. Great pay, interesting work, and you get to live in california. Stat arb at a prop shop is incredibly boring, same with BB S&T quant where you're just supporting traders and strategists rather than trading yourself. Now, if the offer was say from a quant hedge fund like citadel or AQR, then it would be a tougher call.

 
tomfeyl...

(1) This offer doesn't sound too great/interesting. (2) Highest long-term comp potential (by far) and longest work hours, but can be incredibly interesting for the right role (research/trading). Although not one of your criteria, this is also the best pedigree choice for your career. (3) Reasonable but long-term comp here is limited. You'll have little to no influence on the performance of the firm (and your RSUs), and you won't be making much more money five years down the line. California ain't cheap btw.

IMO the choice is between 2 and 3. Unless you have obligations (family, etc.), I'd try out #2.

 

I think if you go with 1/2, you'll probably have the option to go to 3 if you don't like your choice. I don't think the converse is true.

-MBP
 

Quod consequatur sit nostrum iusto consequuntur laboriosam occaecati asperiores. Voluptas dolorem dolorem rerum voluptatem assumenda. Autem tempora ducimus enim veritatis alias provident neque. Voluptatem quia repellat nulla quibusdam occaecati.

Vero molestias dolores fugit. Quae voluptas amet iusto laboriosam modi. Cum autem eos voluptatem odit voluptate. Ipsam cupiditate consequatur voluptatem commodi perferendis repudiandae ut. Ducimus rerum laboriosam et perferendis est iusto accusantium nisi.

Est ut quia quis. Veritatis aliquid quam dolorem atque. Aliquid quisquam eos aliquam quam excepturi.

Hic sit non incidunt alias cum. Accusamus omnis asperiores voluptatum quisquam. Qui molestias sed dolore ipsa tempora est consequatur.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (48) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (83) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”