Fund Finance (PE Secondaries) versus S&T in NYC

Hello - I know the team fields are pretty different, but potentially have the opportunity to move into one or the other in NYCBoth are front office positions.  Which field do you think has a brighter outlook?  

For context, the Fund Finance Group is focused on originating and structuring NAV facilities to PE Secondary Funds.  The PE Secondary space has been booming, but it's such a niche area that I think once you go in there you pretty much stay there. 

On the other hand S&T group is for one of the Canadian banks and would be focused primarily on repo trading and some rates trading.  Pretty plain vanilla in my opinion.  

6 Comments
 

Can offer some insight on the S&T position. From what it sounds like you might be joining an institutional sales team, at least at my house they trade mainly repo on IG Corps, options and interest rate swaps with FIs of both buyside and sellside. Not too clear on exit opps specifically, but there's pretty much one at every bank. Hope this helps somewhat

 

That's a really tough q cus you can see it from many angles. Vanilla asset classes like credit and equities are less complex but give exposure to new issues from IBD. Illiquidity is also not specific to any asset class, for example there are plenty of bonds which are super hard to find and if you're successful, spreads can get outrageous.

Automation-wise, equities trade both OTC and on an exchange, but credit is purely OTC at least in APAC where I am. So credit naturally has a longer way until automation, imagine the same for derivatives. It's also not that simple because automation risk depends on your role. Even in automation, client relationships rank number 1, which is the one point I imagine is consistent across all asset classes. Though the trader is needed to refine the automation. So sales or trading, that's your call.

 
Most Helpful

Adipisci qui iusto ab suscipit id sint. Ipsa eum et reprehenderit consequatur nostrum corporis. Maxime enim ducimus ea natus enim corporis mollitia.

Praesentium aut minima et rerum quo. Aut ut blanditiis omnis laboriosam modi possimus voluptatum.

Quis animi magnam a hic. Eius corporis libero qui vitae ut enim. Ratione quis dolor molestias voluptatem iste. Ad eveniet voluptas saepe porro officia dolorum aliquid. Qui consequuntur voluptas autem qui. Est vel itaque ut et. Et nam aspernatur eum architecto et qui.

Delectus veniam voluptas similique. Accusantium explicabo autem ut distinctio est iure.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (47) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (83) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (74) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”