How does changing the tax rate affect the multiples a company is trading at?

Title.                                                                                                

14 Comments
 

Is no one considering the impact to MEV that would decrease TEV due to lower net earnings > lower earnings per share and in theory, that should lower price per share? So higher taxes does not affect the operational metric but on the TEV side wouldn't it eat away at equity investor earnings, making market equity less valuable and decreasing the overall TEV multiple?

 

Pretty sure this is the right answer for enterprise value multiples, but what would happen to equity multiples where your earnings account for the tax rate change? I guess stay the same assuming markets are perfect?

 

Simply less distributable earnings including potential adverse affects to dividends if applicable. More tax means less earnings. Remember, even calc'ing unlevered fcf for EV requires first EBIT*(1-TR) so you're lowering NOPAT off the bat

 
Most Helpful

The right approach is to ask for more clarification before answering. The mechanical impact of a change in tax rate is well covered above (in absence of additional information), but don't see that as being representative of what actually plays out in the real world. A few other elements to consider:

  • What's the time period of the tax-affected metric (LTM or forward)? When does the change in tax rate kick in? These will all have implications on whether the event will impact a company's multiple 
  •  Is the change in tax rate guided to the market in advance (i.e. broad change in policy from government)? If the case, you'd expected to see immediate multiple compression as public market investors are quicker to price in events, versus brokers adjusting their EPS / FCF forecasts (i.e. if looking at consensus forward multiples). However, this normalizes fairly quickly. When the actual impact materializes, the multiple will have already priced / factored this in (both from investors and brokers).
  • If the tax rate change is specific to the company and a "surprise" to the market, a few potential outcomes:
    • Multiple compression expected to occur immediately post announcement - this is generally moreso due to market psychology as investors haven't had the opportunity to fully digest the financial impact of the new tax rate, so knee-jerk reaction is to sell
    • Multiple stays constant - i.e. market prices in perfectly the revision to equity value vis-a-vis financial impact on the company's earnings
    • Multiple goes up - Most unlikely outcome from my perspective. Potential explanation is public investors have a less pessimistic view on impact vs. brokers   

Note that the points above assumes that tax rates go up (worse for equity investors), and forward consensus estimates. The overarching point is ignoring the impact on equity value and focusing only on earnings / FCF effectively means you're ignoring half the equation, and IMO that doesn't prove to me that the interviewee truly understands the concept at its core.

 

Where did he say that what he wrote was what OP should respond with in an interview? He said “should ask for further clarification” and “these are other potential things to consider”. My read was he was laying out the various potential alternatives depending on what information is provided

 

Associate 3 in IB - Cov:

lol, if your goal is to come across as a tool with a low EQ, this is the right approach. You're technically answering the question literally in your response, but this completely misses the point of what the interviewer is actually asking

Bonehead MBA associate 😂😂 dur dur I read in 400 biws tax go up earnings go down so multiple go up 😂😂😂

 
Funniest
StreetofBulls

The right approach is to ask for more clarification before answering. The mechanical impact of a change in tax rate is well covered above (in absence of additional information), but don't see that as being representative of what actually plays out in the real world. A few other elements to consider:

  • What's the time period of the tax-affected metric (LTM or forward)? When does the change in tax rate kick in? These will all have implications on whether the event will impact a company's multiple 
  •  Is the change in tax rate guided to the market in advance (i.e. broad change in policy from government)? If the case, you'd expected to see immediate multiple compression as public market investors are quicker to price in events, versus brokers adjusting their EPS / FCF forecasts (i.e. if looking at consensus forward multiples). However, this normalizes fairly quickly. When the actual impact materializes, the multiple will have already priced / factored this in (both from investors and brokers).
  • If the tax rate change is specific to the company and a "surprise" to the market, a few potential outcomes:
    • Multiple compression expected to occur immediately post announcement - this is generally moreso due to market psychology as investors haven't had the opportunity to fully digest the financial impact of the new tax rate, so knee-jerk reaction is to sell
    • Multiple stays constant - i.e. market prices in perfectly the revision to equity value vis-a-vis financial impact on the company's earnings
    • Multiple goes up - Most unlikely outcome from my perspective. Potential explanation is public investors have a less pessimistic view on impact vs. brokers   

Note that the points above assumes that tax rates go up (worse for equity investors), and forward consensus estimates. The overarching point is ignoring the impact on equity value and focusing only on earnings / FCF effectively means you're ignoring half the equation, and IMO that doesn't prove to me that the interviewee truly understands the concept at its core.

If you gave this answer in an interview I would immediately ding you

If you tell me this at work I would immediately request to not having to work with you again 

 

Est cum eligendi sunt et non. Explicabo quod occaecati nisi necessitatibus. Eum enim minima ut possimus similique dolor.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (77) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (71) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”