6 Comments
 

Yes. BB S&T will house what you’re referring to, typically as Distressed Trading desks, with a research driven angle when they take on risk.

Desks have varying risk tolerances/strategies. Most well known are DB, Citi, and Barclays. JPM BOFA CS MS and UBS operate under a slightly different mandate and GS has a mostly flow driven strategy. Then there’s Jefferies, RBC, and a handful of others.

 

what's the difference between a distressed debt S&T group at a bank vs a distressed fund (e.g. Oaktree). In terms of what they do I mean.

Could you also explain what you mean by a "flow driven" strategy? thank you.

 

In terms of “work” they do, no real difference, but you can imagine that the opportunity set for Oaktree ($130bn+ AUM) given its different funds, sleeves, etc. allows for larger check sizes and broader mandates. A BB S&T distressed desk will really almost never “buy a company” or write a huge check alone. Funds have greater flexibility in a) actually raising capital, and b) deploying it. Not to say that desks won’t partner up with them in esoteric situations... and the GS desk is run by a former HY trader. HY (more flow driven/liquid vs. distressed) + past performance of that desk leads it to be a more flow driven strategy (trading risk through, as a true market maker).

 

I think you're asking about principal investing, which is different than distressed debt trading on a S&T desk. Principal investing teams at most BB banks are generally more conservative in nature, still great opportunities, and still buyside, but getting that sort of molding in a chains-off sort of environment like a special sits credit fund is plainly different due to bank risk-constraints post GFC.

 

Qui quidem nihil numquam consequuntur et qui. Quod quis tempora ea. Illo et unde neque laudantium enim consectetur esse perspiciatis.

Est cum reprehenderit ut dignissimos repudiandae ipsa deleniti. Maiores occaecati quos et earum adipisci vero. Dolorem est consectetur est sequi labore numquam. Dolorum sed et sed cum quis id. Qui rem voluptas qui. Ducimus culpa et omnis illum. Non minus corrupti velit porro.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (51) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (26) $182
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”