6 Comments
 

Yes. BB S&T will house what you’re referring to, typically as Distressed Trading desks, with a research driven angle when they take on risk.

Desks have varying risk tolerances/strategies. Most well known are DB, Citi, and Barclays. JPM BOFA CS MS and UBS operate under a slightly different mandate and GS has a mostly flow driven strategy. Then there’s Jefferies, RBC, and a handful of others.

 

what's the difference between a distressed debt S&T group at a bank vs a distressed fund (e.g. Oaktree). In terms of what they do I mean.

Could you also explain what you mean by a "flow driven" strategy? thank you.

 

In terms of “work” they do, no real difference, but you can imagine that the opportunity set for Oaktree ($130bn+ AUM) given its different funds, sleeves, etc. allows for larger check sizes and broader mandates. A BB S&T distressed desk will really almost never “buy a company” or write a huge check alone. Funds have greater flexibility in a) actually raising capital, and b) deploying it. Not to say that desks won’t partner up with them in esoteric situations... and the GS desk is run by a former HY trader. HY (more flow driven/liquid vs. distressed) + past performance of that desk leads it to be a more flow driven strategy (trading risk through, as a true market maker).

 

I think you're asking about principal investing, which is different than distressed debt trading on a S&T desk. Principal investing teams at most BB banks are generally more conservative in nature, still great opportunities, and still buyside, but getting that sort of molding in a chains-off sort of environment like a special sits credit fund is plainly different due to bank risk-constraints post GFC.

 

Enim quia dicta eveniet voluptatem saepe blanditiis libero. Quia dolor aut commodi in. Mollitia aut saepe quas ut magni qui.

Nihil et modi minima non. Et similique aliquid tenetur excepturi quasi perspiciatis tenetur. Dignissimos quaerat veniam tempore culpa. Occaecati recusandae dolore sunt culpa accusamus. Et autem sint error maxime optio asperiores quos.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”