Funny that you hate the Zerohedge bias, I love that site. Yes, they are overly pessimistic, but they are right about the general direction this country is headed. I'd much prefer to listen to someone that's overly pessimistic compared to someone who's irrationally optimistic. Another good blog is King World News.

 
JeffSkilling:
Funny that you hate the Zerohedge bias, I love that site. Yes, they are overly pessimistic, but they are right about the general direction this country is headed. I'd much prefer to listen to someone that's overly pessimistic compared to someone who's irrationally optimistic. Another good blog is King World News.

Trading with the goal of making money and reading zerohedge are mutually exclusive events.

 
Cash4Gold:
JeffSkilling:
Funny that you hate the Zerohedge bias, I love that site. Yes, they are overly pessimistic, but they are right about the general direction this country is headed. I'd much prefer to listen to someone that's overly pessimistic compared to someone who's irrationally optimistic. Another good blog is King World News.

Trading with the goal of making money and reading zerohedge are mutually exclusive events.

Who cares about trading I'm talking about investing.

 
Cash4Gold:
JeffSkilling:
Funny that you hate the Zerohedge bias, I love that site. Yes, they are overly pessimistic, but they are right about the general direction this country is headed. I'd much prefer to listen to someone that's overly pessimistic compared to someone who's irrationally optimistic. Another good blog is King World News.

Trading with the goal of making money and reading zerohedge are mutually exclusive events.

I have to disagree. There have been many instances where zerohedge announced CME future margin hike rumors that eventually unfolded to be true. Those trades turned out to be immensely profitable.

Here are a few macro blogs that I have on my feed: http://macro-man.blogspot.ca/ http://blogs.ft.com/gavyndavies/ http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/

 

I have seen news break and ZeroHedge simply omits any positives from the story. For example I was reading a recent Ray Dalio piece in The Economist and he stated that the U.S. economy was the best deleveraging process he could imagine, that is fairly positive. Then ZeroHedge reports this a day later and completely leaves out this comment, instead focusing on his hyperinflation theory from Weiner Republic.

DLJ Analyst Class '96
 

ZeroHedge is great for understanding perspectives that are not usually presented in the mainstream media. Not saying they're always right, but it's always good to know both sides of the story. I personally thought their coverage on recent BLS numbers were great.

I also like brucekrasting.blogspot.com. Simple, to-the-point arguments with well-presented data.

 
Best Response
  1. Just to lay out what he's arguing - I'd tend to agree that you can maybe categorize hedge funds in this way. However, the 'old school macro' was simply really 'fundamental macro'. The key here is that what he's arguing in order to beat the herd at the present point is time is really a return to fundamental macro. Market is short termist? Okay, so you go long termist. It could be said at any point in history when you have gone through times of uncertainty. Market is jittery in 2000-2003? Okay, time to go long term.

  2. He doesn't really indicate why fundamental macro is gone. I mean, if fundamental macro is supposed to be what's working today, then why is old school macro gone? It's the solution, but suddenly it just simply went away?

  3. Hedge funds have taken a beating overall, so you'd expect lower activity. Partly related to point 4:

  4. I'd say investing in global macro was really a mug's game before the great debt crisis. The reigning economic paradigms in 2003-2005 basically indicated perpetual growth in credit, and dissent from these was very rare. As such, fundamental macro investors were simply playing around on the margins, "which EM is going to shoot up next? is it going to be a short time or a medium time before China skyrockets again?". A great deal of the HF industry and particularly macro and thematic bits seem to me to be a giant sales machine (and the CAIA scoring where I'm scored relative to the bottom quartile is a hilarious case in point).

  5. Which really brings us to a further point - macro is pretty hard. Policy options can have a great deal of effect on what happens. And when outcomes look pretty binary as they do here and the big question is one of inflation, then you won't get very directional markets. Volatility in itself also creates herding effects. So short termers have it hard, and long termers have it hard.

  6. And let's remember that a lot of macro and thematic HFs got creamed based on how hard it is. The investors inclined to invest in HFs likely had around a 5-10% allocation already, got hurt badly and withdrew, and new investors are going to be very careful going into HFs. They will want to see brilliance. And brilliance is hard.

  7. In the case of the tourists, I think that' just clever people taking the stage since suddenly nobody is on it. Note that the tourist macro tend to be fundamental investors - so the tourist macro is really the new fundamental macro he requests.

edit: also, all of this is a guess. Just my finger in the air impressions.

 

Hic aut maiores ipsa deserunt tempora. Eveniet sed sed ut et voluptatem animi.

Odio provident sapiente voluptatem autem similique. Sequi minima magnam voluptatum nam est qui. Eius laborum aspernatur architecto eum quod voluptatem. Facere ipsa sapiente quis ex.

Enim ut adipisci quis eveniet est aut eum. Cupiditate minima in est iusto quia assumenda totam. Autem sapiente commodi et inventore voluptatem exercitationem. Et qui molestias amet incidunt veniam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (67) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Kenny_Powers_CFA's picture
Kenny_Powers_CFA
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”