Obama Fires Wagoner!

I guess going begging in a corporate jet leaves a lasting impression. General Motors CEO Rick Wagoner was forced to resign by the Obama administration today, as part of the massive amount of strings attached to automaker bailout money.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0309/20625.h…

While I think Wagoner's resignation is long overdue, it is a little troubling that it had to come at the behest of the government. This is taking the executive compensation issue to a whole new level.

Does Obama really believe that the U.S. auto industry, with its bloated pension requirements, deeply-entrenched unions, and blatant inability to compete on a global scale is actually worth saving? Can't we just let anything die anymore?

Have any of you been to Michigan lately? It's no wonder the kids are volunteering for the military. Baghdad is safer than Flint, Pontiac, or Detroit these days. Just stick a fork in it, for crying out loud.

 

With the credit markets in their current state, is filing for bankruptcy really an option? Wouldn't the end result be a liquidation?

Another question- I've heard arguments in favor of a sort of "pre-packaged" bankruptcy scenario. Does that idea have any legs if the government helps to facilitate the move and provide some kind of support in helping an automaker enter into a standard Chapter 11 and emerge as a going concern?

 
Best Response

I'm going to be a little contrarian here and suggest that GM is making great cars these days.

GM has a lot of problems and any number of those may be Rick Wagoner's fault. You don't have to know very much about the auto industry to know that GM is in bad, bad shape.

But I find it frustrating when people write off GM as being unable to build competitive cars. From the Chevy Malibu, to the Traverse/Outlook family of crossovers, the Pontiac G8, the entire Cadillac family and the full size pickups GM is building a lot of absolutely terrific automobiles. I would argue that GM builds a competitive model in almost every space in which it competes.

Ten years ago this wasn't true. And public perception seems to still be that the American car manufacturers are building unreliable and inferior cars. Which is unfortunate.

I would also argue that since purchasing Hummer, GM has gotten most of the really big strategic decisions right: the sale of GMAC when it happened, the heavy push into electric etc. GM and Ford to me (very much unlike Chrysler) were companies that were headed in the right direction before the start of this recession.

Finally I will add sometimes when confidence is lost, change is needed at the top just for change's sake. I think this might be what the Obama administration was thinking.

 

Who cares if they are making great cars? That has very little to do with whether they are a viable business. Their margins on those cars are too small to support their bloated organizational structure and accumulated obligations. Writing GM off has nothing to do with the quality of their product, and everything to do with whether the cost of bringing that product to market outweighs the value that product represents

 

Non totam reiciendis optio deleniti. Molestias ab est beatae ut explicabo et non. Sed veniam animi quis qui ut veniam molestiae. Blanditiis amet sit deleniti temporibus rerum doloribus quia.

Maiores ad consectetur totam nobis numquam vitae harum. Eos possimus eaque rerum. Explicabo consequatur enim et ad nesciunt fuga et repellat. Aut qui asperiores dolore laborum.

Error et dignissimos exercitationem deleniti voluptas non qui. Facere voluptatem nisi voluptatem qui deserunt vel fugit. Id blanditiis deleniti autem. Ducimus officia sint deserunt nihil dignissimos laboriosam quia. Sit doloremque autem non et velit cum esse culpa. Earum quas at in qui non nulla a. Hic beatae similique iure doloremque.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”