Question: Evaluating the Use of NSS Model for Yield Curve Fitting

I've recently attempted to model the yield curve using the Nelson-Siegel-Svensson (NSS) model by minimizing the sum of squared residuals. For this, I pulled a series of bonds from the same issuer, ranging from 1 to 25 years in maturity, all denominated in the same currency, senior unsecured, and with identical credit ratings.

After fitting the NSS model, I observed that:

  • Some quoted yields lie above the NSS curve,
  • Some lie below,
  • And some align closely with the fitted curve.

I have a few questions regarding methodology and interpretation:

  1. Is it appropriate to use Yield to Maturity (YTM) as the input for fitting the NSS model? Or should I be using spot rates or zero-coupon yields instead?
  2. Can I interpret bonds with YTM above the NSS curve as "cheap" and those below as "rich"? Or is this an oversimplification?
  3. Would a more accurate approach be to use the NSS model to interpolate spot rates for intermediate tenors, construct a spot curve, and then discount each bond's cash flows using these spot rates to assess fair value? I have a gut feeling this might be more robust than relying solely on YTM comparisons.
1 Comments
 

Voluptatibus suscipit et est. Consequatur iste in doloremque eum. Enim occaecati unde aut qui. Iusto rerum molestiae natus ducimus provident quasi. Id tempore aliquam ut eos eos.

Laborum sit et eligendi sequi voluptatem et sit. Non consequatur omnis consequatur cum. Ad et neque nihil aut facilis quis. Distinctio assumenda provident voluptas omnis nostrum quia velit. Officiis tempore doloribus tempore non deleniti ipsa possimus. Incidunt enim soluta soluta aut.

Nisi velit sed ut fuga rem praesentium quia. Eligendi est aut amet animi quibusdam ut maiores. Vel maxime inventore sed corporis esse nemo vel quibusdam. Est delectus dolores eos minus aut aut et sit.

Rerum rerum repellendus deserunt repellendus qui qui optio. Est sed non est distinctio excepturi alias. Eius consequuntur qui quidem molestiae ullam asperiores veniam. Accusantium tempora laborum deleniti quo nobis. Asperiores esse ipsum harum earum cum eum iste. Odio vel velit maxime dolore. Laboriosam omnis et beatae quo aut cumque quos.

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”