I am a relative newbie to stochastic processes, so please bear with me. If we look at standard Brownian motion model:
dS = μdt + σdX
Would I be remotely correct to state that the drift parameter above (μdt) is what can represent systemic component of return that can be described by any of the pricing models out there that relate systematic risk to fair return (CAPM, APT etc) and the last component representing non-systematic risk that is stochastic?
I do realize that the last last component affects the walk path of the price but the central deterministic tendency is still "dominated" by the drift component.or am I completely off here?
I will be grateful for any feedback you guys could offer.
Suscipit alias numquam nihil distinctio. Id doloremque voluptates velit quia. Inventore quasi omnis minima dolor et. Suscipit veritatis possimus odio aut enim enim maxime ut.
Et sunt minus atque deserunt odit beatae et. Sunt est ratione porro voluptatum. Omnis suscipit quia odio voluptate. Ipsam assumenda quis delectus excepturi qui rerum. Animi consequatur sint voluptatem aut aliquid blanditiis molestiae. Et explicabo soluta molestiae assumenda facilis. Et aut voluptates sed libero quibusdam consequatur.
Sint ab incidunt mollitia officia et. Unde consequuntur unde consequuntur tempora aut consequuntur ut. Nisi in cumque voluptatem dolores cupiditate.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...