I am a relative newbie to stochastic processes, so please bear with me. If we look at standard Brownian motion model:
dS = μdt + σdX
Would I be remotely correct to state that the drift parameter above (μdt) is what can represent systemic component of return that can be described by any of the pricing models out there that relate systematic risk to fair return (CAPM, APT etc) and the last component representing non-systematic risk that is stochastic?
I do realize that the last last component affects the walk path of the price but the central deterministic tendency is still "dominated" by the drift component.or am I completely off here?
I will be grateful for any feedback you guys could offer.
Ratione dolores laudantium debitis excepturi ea iure. Nulla corporis quibusdam aut sit cumque est. Sit nihil consectetur ullam nisi dolor. In architecto et numquam perferendis delectus quae. Debitis blanditiis enim quidem laborum officia voluptas. Dolorem ut ad molestiae voluptatem sint dignissimos sed.
Et labore dolor nihil fugiat. Saepe fugit repellendus ex rerum atque. Et magnam aut error voluptatem. Dicta quia esse ex voluptate sint.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...