ROIC and NOPAT margins seem unreasonably high

After completing a DCF for a target company I calculate a few metrics for an executive summary.

This is a SaaS growth equity investment and the target goes from unprofitable to profitable through the holding period. In the last historical year the NOPAT margin and ROIC are 4.3% and 8.5%, respectively. These 2 metrics have been growing the last three years by about 10% each year. In the last historical year, the company repaid their outstanding notes and are debtless now. The company generates so much cash that they were able to pay 1 bill of notes in 3 years. 

Due to not having debt and me assuming there will be no debt issuances in the future (because I cannot predict that), my ROIC stays above 100% between pro-forma year 3 and year 6. The ROIC is about 50% at the end of projected year 10. The NOPAT margin stays in the mid 30s% throughout the forecast period, finishing year 10 at 28%. This looks very unreasonable. 

I calculate NOPAT as EBIT adjusted for non-recurring items * (1- tax rate)/average invested capital. The company does not have significant non-recurring items that I add to EBIT and project afterwards. Average invested capital is average equity (this year and last year) + average long term debt (I exclude operating lease obligations and there are no finance leases).

My assumptions for revenue growth and expenses follow management guidelines and I reduce growth assumptions (as well as stabilizing expenses) further into the projections. The result of my DCF puts the implied share price closer to the low of wall street's estimates.

1) What can I be possibly doing wrong or are such ratios a common occurrance with projections of high growth companies? 

2) Are such metrics (if true) a good argument for investing in the company, even though it may be trading close to its implied share price from the DCF?

Thanks!

5 Comments
 

Thank you for the idea!

If the target focuses on R&D rather than sales teams, would the LTV/CAC carry as much weight? Or you would focus on a different set of metrics such as productivity of engineers and R&D cost as a % of revenue?

 

Nihil occaecati alias blanditiis sit dolor non. Facere necessitatibus dolorem repellat iure ea deleniti.

Dignissimos id eum voluptatem libero at. Ut distinctio perspiciatis corporis et sunt nemo. In tempora ratione dolorem quo. Qui amet numquam veritatis enim fugiat neque.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”