S&T: How is it different than market making?
S&T: How is it different than market making?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trending Content - Sales and Trading Forum
Career Resources
WSO Free Modeling Series - Now Open Through
September 30, 2026
9 Free Financial Modeling Lessons
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
+Bonus: Get 27 financial modeling templates in swipe file
+Bonus: Get 27 financial modeling templates in swipe file
High Finance Applications
Guaranteed
Get at least one offer GUARANTEED
- 1:1 support
- 92% success rate
- 2,000+ mentor network
- Unlimited Live bootcamps
- AI for resume + LinkedIn
- Networking automation tools
- HireVue simulation tool
- Full course library
- Private Slack community
- 20hrs of mocks
- + much more...
Market making is just one aspect of the trading side. There's agency trading, flow trading, and of course hedging risk alongside the various functions of sales.
this sounds like an investopedia copy paste
It is.. by and large, market making? This is kind of a non-question
S&T is literally market making. It shocks me how little is described about the S&T process.
Customer a comes in and says make me a market on a 20 year SOFR swap. Sales asks trading for the price. Trading gives sales the two way price.
Sales tries to read the customer and put markup on the correct side. Client deals or doesnt deal. Trading takes the opposite position as the client and now either has to get rid of his position in the broker market, hedge it completly, or find another custy on the opposite side. That process right there is called market making.
But... Guess what. Thats not all of tradings job. Trading can literally just buy whatever they want in the market and hold it for a day and call it pre-hedging. Its a hedgefund with less risk carried overnight and only one product + a risk manger making you not take too crazy of a position. Without taking directional risk trading desks will make no PNL
This is a good answer for the most part. One caveat I would add is that the split between pure market-making versus prop trading really depends on the desk. On an agency desk, the amount of prop risk will likely be low. But on a principal desk (most desks in FICC, especially derivs desks), every customer trade is essentially your prop risk. I've found if you want to be a great market maker, you really have to be a great prop trader, or more specifically, operate like you are at a fund. Positioning, anticipation of flow, and constant involvement and price discovery in the interdealer market is what separates the average from the great. So to answer your question, it's a mix of both.
Explicabo voluptatem enim ullam nobis tempore debitis quia. Quo et ea consequuntur et animi. Itaque excepturi id iusto dolorem. Dolor nulla error at voluptas quia ullam et.
Provident est vel nihil suscipit eum delectus aliquid ad. Commodi consequuntur nam unde qui quos. Dolor ut repudiandae qui quas asperiores autem.
Dignissimos cum quo natus. Et expedita nihil quos sit. Eum ea et voluptatem sed veritatis quos.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...