Top macro trading desk to choose for FT?

Would appreciate some thoughts on this. I got into markets from a STEM background mainly due to a macro/rates interest in trying to understand the drivers behind yield curves, monetary policy decisions, and so on. That said, I’m also trying to weigh future job security, PnL potential, and exit opps down the line.

My options are:

  1. Government bond trading, where I like the tangible macro exposure but am slightly concerned with the longevity of the career/automation risk and (potentially?) limited PnL opportunities
  2. FX vol, which is doable with my STEM background, but I don't think has the same macro thinking (rather than more conceptual mathematical reasoning). It also seems like FX vol is more pigeonholed as a product and likely has fewer HF exits?

Trying to keep a long-term perspective in choosing between these desks, what other factors than those above should I consider? I appreciate any views, especially from someone in macro trading who have seen themselves and their peers end up on different paths after starting out on different desks.

15 Comments
 

I would agree with this and go with FXO. I work on an options desk and there’s are multiple benefits to this desk. You are still extremely macro, you’ll have an edge having true options trading under your belt. Not to mention you trade rates on this desk quite often due to the inherit IR risk in FX. You’ll trade IR swaps to hedge rates position, take a view, or hedge vol posi. In addition you trade xccy basis and swaptions.

So you get true trading experience in a variety of products that give you more opportunities to go buy side if that’s what you want especially at these multi-strats. Not to mention it’s still extremely high touch and much less automated than a vanilla rates desk. Just my opinion, and do agree take into consideration the bank you work at and where they rank in each product.

 
Most Helpful

This is a tough one, options are important to understand and most buy side macro PMs use options one way or another and those ones that come from a linear background would be keen to hire vol-trained juniors to help them. Especially in FX, a lot of them like doing directional punts with light exotics so if you understand well what goes into the pricing, how is vol vs skew driving the risk-reward, etc that could be a good way to sell yourself. N.B. when it comes to vanilla vs exo you should always pick vanilla if you have a buy side exit in mind. That said, I've seen more people exit to risk taking seats from linear rates than from FXO. 

In the grand scheme of things this is a good problem to have. Both career paths are good and I'd go with whichever looks more interesting to you. To get a feel for the products and the type of analysis that goes into them check out this github which is filled with research for different asset classes:
https://github.com/yieldcurvemonkey/Curvy-CUSIPs/tree/main/research

 

Agree with this. For the sake of explanation, the "vol vs skew is driving risk reward" refers to something like: if skew is priced for puts over and it richens then maybe want to do put spread / EKO / etc to see some of that rich vol (same thing for skew pointing for calls over). If the structure has net vega exposure, then are you buying/selling vol off a high or low base... 

 

Hey, thanks for the response. Could I please PM about something related?

 

Sequi et ad nulla enim. Voluptatem distinctio in et necessitatibus eum porro ex beatae. Et est dolorum et quod eum voluptas.

Omnis ad excepturi repellat harum et sit. Voluptatum dolorem rerum ex aperiam fugiat. Totam libero corporis tempore minima iusto nostrum temporibus. Et placeat incidunt provident dolorem est odit. Dicta veritatis omnis numquam sint magni. At aut velit modi amet alias aspernatur repellat. Inventore aut autem perferendis qui qui debitis ut optio.

Rerum earum modi et fugiat repudiandae ut qui. Velit vel velit recusandae ab. Omnis ipsam fugiat ex deserunt facere debitis. Mollitia qui quod aperiam quia error.

Ut voluptas quasi ex doloribus occaecati. Perspiciatis quo non sapiente non.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (66) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”