Trade Commission regulation?

Hi everyone,

I have a really amateur question about trade commission that I was hoping that someone here can help me answer.

My question is: What prevents a trader from buying a huge quantity of security from the exclusive security inventory of the issuer or market maker (e.g. UBS), and reselling them to retail customer with a big markup? I know there must be some regulations involved, but how do traders make money if this method of buying low and selling high is not permitted?

Thanks!

 

uh, efficient markets pretty much stop this. any account that would be stupid enough to get ripped off in a way that would violate some kind of "fair play" regulations tend to not last very long. this pretty much would probably only be possible in structured products, and rest assured that accounts most certainly shop around. it would probably be impossible (and suicidal to your franchise) to get away with outright gouging a a client. people talk, and aren't stupid. it would be very difficult to execute a trade like that when the account looking to buy looks around and sees other trades vastly cheaper.

 

Do traders only make money based on % commission on quantity of security then? If they're offering securities from their own capital markets, would they be able to set their own offer price? or are they still in competition with everyone else to offer the lowest price?

 
Best Response

"wrong, you're still going to see similar structures trade within each other, and if there are price differences, they're typically due to someone's term model on a swaption"

No. First of all swaptions are a vanilla instrument and are widely quoted and traded. You are very unlikely to see price divergence in any atm swaptions.

If you ask a variety of dealers for a decently out of the money spread option (which is one of the most basic exotics) you will get radically different prices. the things never trade, and no one knows where they should be exactly. hedge funds love to play the 'pick off a dealer' game. I've seen quotes on structures where some prices are double or triple the others. Try finding a price on a 5 yr curve cap on 10s-2s struck at 125 or 150 for instance.

The difference gets even more pronounced when a complex structure is brought to the market for the first time...the level it prints at the first time can be very, very different from where it prints the second time.

what do you trade, liquidity?

Jimbo

 

i think you're proving my point. the question is whether or not you can rip someone off just by pure ignorance, i.e. crossing securities at huge spreads of something that is vanilla.

let's look at what you picked as your example: a very out-of-the-money option that never trades. i just said that if there are huge price differences, it's a VALUATION issue, not that someone doesn't know who's offering what structure at what level. hmm... illiquid out-of-the-money stuff that doesn't trade has huge price differences, while the at-the-money swaptions that they run THROUGH THE SAME MODEL as the first option all trade at the same level. i'm a CMO/ABS trader, so let me draw a comparative exampl with an area i know. Current coupon Agency CMOs? 3bp markets, pretty much no matter what the structure. Seasoned premium passthrough CMOs, say like a 9% GN2 100wala bond? Prices will go from 102-00 all the way to 107-00, since everyone runs it through an OAS model to determine where they care and this model overweights seasoning, and that model overweights loan balance, etc. They trade rarely, and hence no reasonable trader can look at their model and calibrate it to where stuff trades. When someone puts them out for the bid, bids are all over the place. Same thing with your example: nobody knows what's the fair level for your illiquid trades because IT DOESN'T TRADE. Take a look at mortgage derivatives: trust IOs and POs are super leveraged towards prepayments and are heavily driven by prepay models, and yet they still trade at tight markets.

so you're actually just demonstrating what i'm trying to get at: if there is a huge price difference, it's because it's a valuation/modeling issue, not a ripoff issue. even the exotic stuff that no one knows for sure what it's worth trades at efficient markets given enough people trading them actively. i mean why do you think one-of-a-kind structured credit products actually make money? you will not and cannot find any kind of product that is traded actively that results in any kind of massive ripoff.

 

trade rates.

the models are different for swaptions than for the more exotic stuff. there are lots of models being used in my market now, it's really not that standardized. so price divergence occurs based differing views of model, and the first time a structure is brought to market, the customer can get absolutely jacked b/c no one has seen it before.

"you will not and cannot find any kind of product that is traded actively that results in any kind of massive ripoff."

unless it's sold into retail.

 

What kind of market do you see for these kind of exotics? most is OTC if I'm not mistaken. I know for low liquidity markets like deferred commodities, commercials like to execute swaptions OTC so they don't move the market.

Do you guys actually put on these far out-of-the money trades? Unless you are a big player and need to hedge, I don't see why you would get involved.

 

"What kind of market do you see for these kind of exotics? most is OTC if I'm not mistaken. I know for low liquidity markets like deferred commodities, commercials like to execute swaptions OTC so they don't move the market.

Do you guys actually put on these far out-of-the money trades? Unless you are a big player and need to hedge, I don't see why you would get involved "

Lots of overseas investors love this stuff...not necessarily a business need, just take a punt and trying to juice returns.

and yes it's all otc.

 

Modi commodi molestiae tempore labore accusamus ut. Distinctio quidem porro officiis repudiandae.

Rerum consequatur ipsam odit totam nemo. Voluptatem tenetur autem labore fuga. Animi et quidem et voluptatem. Dicta qui mollitia hic enim. Numquam voluptatem neque ea dolorum dolor sequi libero. Atque ut sit modi libero eos dicta.

A ducimus illo ipsum assumenda est iusto. Minus et dolor excepturi aliquam qui provident. Tenetur facere voluptatem et earum. Enim molestiae consectetur voluptatem dolorem omnis.

Explicabo qui rem quaerat est. Sint vero vitae totam modi quia fugit. Iusto fuga sit odit. Maiores unde esse at officia.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (20) $385
  • Associates (88) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (67) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”