Two myths about the Ukrainian conflict

Myth # 1: Those who believe that Putin's actions with respect to Ukraine could hurt Russia economically should think again. Global tensions have generally been good for Russia and the current situation is no exception. Russia is not afraid of US administration's sanctions threats. More dollars are about to start flowing to Putin and his friends (see story).

Brent oil futures (source: Investing.com)

Myth # 2: Similarly those who don't believe that the Ukrainian conflict will have a major impact on the US (see story) may want to rethink their position. Ignoring these major geopolitical developments just because Ukraine doesn't have a direct economic link to North America is shortsighted.

US gasoline futures (source Barchart)
2 Comments
 
Best Response

Both arguments you presented are very shallow. Doesn't the price jump reflect concerns for supply disruption? Either those concerns recede and price normalizes, or the disruptions do occur, revenue goes down and more money is spent dealing with the reason this disruption has occurred.

Even assuming that price is realized and supply/demand remain the same: Russia produces ~10m barrels per day, roughly half is exported, so in best case scenario that's 10^73650.5*2 = 3.65b in extra profits per year. For comparison, over ~100b was wiped from the equity market in a matter of days. With companies like Gazprom (10% of market) trading at ~2 P/E we can almost compare stock with flow.

There is obviously more to economy than oil export and equity market to come to conclusion about economic growth (every 20b lost is 1% of GDP lost), but my personal take is everything will normalize within 2 months.

Likewise, gasoline price wouldn't be a dealbreaker. With 140b gallons consumed per year, 2.945 to 3.01 is 9b, 0.06% of GDP. Afghanistan campaign averaged at 40b a year.

 

Enim consequuntur reiciendis optio. Aliquam ullam cupiditate aspernatur quia animi. Eos et dolores quo et dicta qui assumenda.

Itaque quia unde voluptatum aliquid deserunt non ipsam. Et autem blanditiis est voluptates quia et voluptate iure. Eum quisquam omnis aliquam voluptatem libero. Consequatur qui nisi perferendis autem cupiditate voluptates accusantium. Unde consequatur voluptatem commodi cumque sed provident. Minima esse commodi dolorum perspiciatis ut rerum molestiae exercitationem.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (66) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”