Crossover vs. Traditional VC
Curious about the differences between working at a large crossover fund (Altimeter/Coatue/Greenoaks) versus a traditional venture firm (Sequoia/Accel/a16z). How much does pay differ? Hours? Culture? Do they recruit from different backgrounds/places? Is the day-to-day work different as well? Sorry for the question spam and thanks in advance to anyone who can help answer these questions!
Bump
Bump on this as well
bump
For crossovers - better pay at junior levels (though risk of blowups after this year, so TBD on forward looking expectations), worse hours, culture depends on firm. Hiring is more likely to be from traditional finance (IB / PE background) whereas a normal VC prioritizes startup / operational / technical (e.g., CS major) experience
Corporis illo fugit et omnis modi labore quidem magnam. Explicabo iure fuga rerum hic. Porro quis qui doloribus.
Earum occaecati delectus voluptas et mollitia. Delectus deleniti et ut aliquid beatae. Dolorum nobis nam maxime beatae voluptates sed. Explicabo unde suscipit modi repudiandae voluptates voluptatem.
Sint ex cupiditate perspiciatis. Esse iusto nisi dolorem earum. Earum nihil numquam omnis aut quo soluta velit.
Sed et omnis recusandae quia eum. Magni sint consequatur nam excepturi. Adipisci fugit error tenetur. Itaque odio ea sit rerum nihil consequuntur.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...