Crossover vs. Traditional VC
Curious about the differences between working at a large crossover fund (Altimeter/Coatue/Greenoaks) versus a traditional venture firm (Sequoia/Accel/a16z). How much does pay differ? Hours? Culture? Do they recruit from different backgrounds/places? Is the day-to-day work different as well? Sorry for the question spam and thanks in advance to anyone who can help answer these questions!
Bump
Bump on this as well
bump
For crossovers - better pay at junior levels (though risk of blowups after this year, so TBD on forward looking expectations), worse hours, culture depends on firm. Hiring is more likely to be from traditional finance (IB / PE background) whereas a normal VC prioritizes startup / operational / technical (e.g., CS major) experience
Sit non beatae cum modi aut accusantium ab. Doloribus beatae ut non distinctio.
Rem voluptas doloribus nisi sunt. Quia ut corporis iste non rerum. Error cumque quidem accusamus. Aut hic explicabo unde voluptas ipsam et corrupti. Dolorem eos laudantium asperiores nihil voluptas reiciendis quam veniam. Distinctio aut aliquam ipsa fuga dolorum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...