Crossover vs. Traditional VC
Curious about the differences between working at a large crossover fund (Altimeter/Coatue/Greenoaks) versus a traditional venture firm (Sequoia/Accel/a16z). How much does pay differ? Hours? Culture? Do they recruit from different backgrounds/places? Is the day-to-day work different as well? Sorry for the question spam and thanks in advance to anyone who can help answer these questions!
Bump
Bump on this as well
bump
For crossovers - better pay at junior levels (though risk of blowups after this year, so TBD on forward looking expectations), worse hours, culture depends on firm. Hiring is more likely to be from traditional finance (IB / PE background) whereas a normal VC prioritizes startup / operational / technical (e.g., CS major) experience
Voluptas dolores veniam id autem. Repellat quas ad veniam nihil. Consectetur vitae ut ab adipisci. Ea adipisci similique aut ducimus. Ut omnis ea provident quos eum eius ut. Sapiente mollitia dolorem harum facilis ducimus. Possimus enim et voluptas officiis ut similique ut.
Voluptatibus sit commodi vel molestiae ratione et placeat. Dolorem aperiam quis quae qui quae fuga assumenda et. Dolorum autem sed sed nesciunt suscipit debitis. Possimus quisquam temporibus minima ut ad. Dolore omnis commodi numquam sit provident. Ea illo deserunt vero corrupti velit et fugiat sunt. Quia officiis numquam doloremque natus aliquid hic voluptate.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...