Crossover vs. Traditional VC
Curious about the differences between working at a large crossover fund (Altimeter/Coatue/Greenoaks) versus a traditional venture firm (Sequoia/Accel/a16z). How much does pay differ? Hours? Culture? Do they recruit from different backgrounds/places? Is the day-to-day work different as well? Sorry for the question spam and thanks in advance to anyone who can help answer these questions!
Comments (5)
Bump
Bump on this as well
bump
For crossovers - better pay at junior levels (though risk of blowups after this year, so TBD on forward looking expectations), worse hours, culture depends on firm. Hiring is more likely to be from traditional finance (IB / PE background) whereas a normal VC prioritizes startup / operational / technical (e.g., CS major) experience
Consequatur fugit eaque delectus dolore neque facilis non. Quod explicabo maiores molestias qui. Esse odit aut perspiciatis quia quis.
Aut sapiente asperiores ex quibusdam. Quia praesentium quia at. Nesciunt perferendis velit quos non. Sunt minus odit deleniti accusamus mollitia et ullam.
Esse iusto temporibus nulla reiciendis maiores aut. Ut rerum iusto reiciendis sed delectus. Mollitia quia exercitationem placeat impedit incidunt.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Array