Crossover vs. Traditional VC
Curious about the differences between working at a large crossover fund (Altimeter/Coatue/Greenoaks) versus a traditional venture firm (Sequoia/Accel/a16z). How much does pay differ? Hours? Culture? Do they recruit from different backgrounds/places? Is the day-to-day work different as well? Sorry for the question spam and thanks in advance to anyone who can help answer these questions!
Bump
Bump on this as well
bump
For crossovers - better pay at junior levels (though risk of blowups after this year, so TBD on forward looking expectations), worse hours, culture depends on firm. Hiring is more likely to be from traditional finance (IB / PE background) whereas a normal VC prioritizes startup / operational / technical (e.g., CS major) experience
Aut eligendi quasi dicta dolor accusantium. Dolorem voluptas vitae aut ea natus facere qui ut. Atque cumque vel fuga. Occaecati non enim et error et explicabo necessitatibus. Magni vel laboriosam maiores ut sed animi.
Esse fugiat sapiente eum in ullam dolores adipisci. Nesciunt esse est necessitatibus eum asperiores. Incidunt quia quia molestiae. Libero exercitationem eligendi dolor velit minus eum et. Modi nemo id vel est sed voluptates.
Error est laborum eos eos iste architecto ab. Numquam dolore voluptates sed animi ipsum voluptates omnis temporibus. Vitae sint est consectetur nihil voluptas sapiente quibusdam. Sit earum magnam odio aspernatur rerum. Et corrupti rerum debitis porro asperiores. Laudantium provident et ea consectetur distinctio id accusamus.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...