Do I Need the IB Stamp for Growth Equity?
I’m currently an associate at a Series A–B VC/PC hybrid 200-250M fund in California. I genuinely love my work, but long term I want to move up-market into C,D,E growth equity where the work is more valuation- and underwriting-heavy. I’m already strong on technicals and can build financial models, but I don’t have the traditional “IB signal” on my resume, which seems to matter for screening.
It feels like I have two paths:
Keep doing what i enjoy, stay in VC and try to network up-market while getting deal reps and sharpening investment judgment.Do a boutique/lower MM IB stint to earn the resume signal and structured transaction brand that helps open GE doors.
Although i don't want to do IB, I'm fully willing to do it for my future. If you’ve made this move, hired for GE, or thought through this decision, what would you do in my position? Any advice or thoughts from anyone is much appreciated. Thanks! :)
Based on the most helpful WSO content, your situation is a classic dilemma for those looking to transition into growth equity (GE) from a non-IB background. Here's a breakdown of your options and considerations:
1. Staying in VC and Networking Up-Market
2. Pursuing an IB Stint
Key Considerations:
Advice:
Ultimately, the decision depends on your willingness to step away from work you enjoy for a short-term IB stint versus doubling down on your current path and networking your way into GE. Both paths are viable, but the IB route may provide a more straightforward transition into growth equity.
Sources: Breakdown of Post-IB Exit Opportunities, Private Equity vs. Venture Capital in 2018, Breakdown of Post-IB Exit Opportunities
Ignore my title. I’ve seen all kinds of backgrounds at some lesser known growth equity firms. I’d say if you truly feel like you can crush a case study then I would start networking to try to land some interviews and lateral directly. Going to banking could set you up for interviews but you’d likely start as an associate 1, get 1-2 years of experience, and lateral as an associate 1 again. Title doesn’t seem important until you realize it’s directly tied to your comp and actually does matter quite a bit. You’re already on the buy side so I don’t think sacrificing that much comp is worth it in your case.
Voluptas distinctio inventore exercitationem quod a ut. Voluptas natus sequi est veniam ducimus dolorem labore. Dolorem fugiat quo ut magni quia est qui.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...