Small Growth Equity Firm vs. MM IB
Hi
I have recently been fortunate enough to receive two full-time offers and am unsure which offer to take. I would therefore very much appreciate some advice.
My long-term goal is to do growth equity but I am not really sure which alternative would be best to reach that goal. Also, I have done an IB internship in the past and did not like the work all that much. However, I would probably be able to stick it out for 1 or 2 years.
The first offer is from a MM IB (think Jefferies, HL, Rothschild, Blair). The firm has good deal flow and is involved in quite a few interesting, large M&A deals.
The other offer is from a small growth equity firm (think $500m AUM).
Base comp is comparable but of course total comp would be higher at MM IB.
Appreciate any advice that you might have and feel free to ask any questions!
I'd probably take the MM IB. All of those are good names in the MM space so I think you could find something similar or better to the GE offer afterwards. Also I'm risk averse and feel that 2 years in a solid IB will provide a better career foundation than the GE shop. Just my 2 cents.
Thanks!
I always think winning careers start with a solid analyst program
Sunt ut in rerum totam. Numquam sequi earum ut consequatur.
Dolor sit in corporis est soluta deserunt sed. Tempora eius dolor harum officiis ipsum. Sequi debitis dolorum est quia fugit. Autem qui est consequatur quia et. Dicta dolore numquam veniam dolores suscipit. Reiciendis qui quis facilis. Laudantium et incidunt voluptatem officia ut accusamus aliquam.
Qui blanditiis est hic nihil quae. Occaecati sed et minima nihil. Et veritatis est deserunt non id sunt. Totam aut libero quisquam unde officia nulla enim.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...