Technical pre-money/post-money tx assumptions qq

Hello! I'm interested in a more technical transaction question typically seen in growth equity cases. Would be incredibly helpful to get some experienced thoughts.

Let's say the company as of closing has 100m PF net debt. Let's say the offer EV is 10x 100m fwd EBITDA = 1,000m. The minority investor invests 200m primary, and 100m secondary for a total ticket of 300m. Let's also say that as part of the transaction, the company takes on 400m debt, and that transactions costs are 10m.

EV: 1,000m

  • Pre-money EqV: 1,000m-100m=900m?
  • Post-money EqV: 900m+200m=1,100m?

This implies (200m+100m)/1,100m=27.3% ownership of investor at entry (assuming no discount for the secondary and they're done at the same time)? But, shouldn't we factor in the acquisition debt here to fully bridge from EV to EqV? Said differently, isn't the actual post-money EqV 900m+200m-400m=700m? The more debt is used here, the more the post-money EqV decreases, which leads to lower prices per share. That seems counterintuitive, as I wouldn't understand why existing shareholders (doesn't matter whether they're participating in the capital increase or not) should have a lower equity absolute value post transaction?

Separately, what would be the correct sources and uses in this example?

Sources total: 1,110m

  • Company roll: (1-27.3%) * 700m = 509m
  • Investor equity: 27.3% * 700m + 10m = 201m
  • Acquisition debt: 400m

Uses total: 1,110m

  • Company equity: pre-money EqV = 900m
  • Primary: 200m
  • Transaction costs: 10m

Thanks in advance!!

2 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, here's how to approach your question:

Pre-Money and Post-Money Equity Value:

  1. Pre-Money Equity Value:
    Pre-money EqV = EV - Net Debt = $1,000m - $100m = $900m.

  2. Post-Money Equity Value:
    Post-money EqV = Pre-money EqV + Primary Investment = $900m + $200m = $1,100m.

    However, your concern about factoring in the acquisition debt is valid. If the company takes on $400m of new debt, the net debt increases, which impacts the equity value. Adjusting for this: Adjusted Post-Money EqV = Pre-money EqV + Primary Investment - New Debt = $900m + $200m - $400m = $700m.

    This adjusted post-money EqV reflects the increased leverage, which reduces the equity value. The counterintuitive nature of this result stems from the fact that the new debt increases the company's obligations, reducing the residual value available to equity holders.

  3. Ownership Calculation:
    Investor Ownership = (Primary + Secondary) / Adjusted Post-Money EqV = ($200m + $100m) / $700m = 42.9%.
    This is higher than the 27.3% you calculated because the adjusted post-money EqV accounts for the new debt.

Sources and Uses Table:

Sources:

  • Investor Equity: $300m (Primary: $200m, Secondary: $100m).
  • Acquisition Debt: $400m.
  • Company Roll: Remaining equity value = Adjusted Post-Money EqV - Investor Equity = $700m - $300m = $400m.

Total Sources: $1,100m.

Uses:

  • Company Equity (Pre-Money EqV): $900m.
  • Primary Investment: $200m.
  • Transaction Costs: $10m.

Total Uses: $1,110m.

Key Takeaways:

  1. The adjusted post-money EqV reflects the impact of new debt, which reduces the equity value available to shareholders.
  2. Ownership percentages should be calculated based on the adjusted post-money EqV to account for the leverage.
  3. The sources and uses table should balance, ensuring all funds are allocated appropriately.

If you have further clarifications or need deeper insights, feel free to ask!

Sources: Pre-money vs. post-money valuation and Modigliani Miller, Sources and Uses statement - private LBO model, M&A Question Asked by PJT London, What is paid for an aquisition - EV or Equity Value?, How Private Equity Owned Companies Fund Add-Ons

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Nisi rem earum quo. Est ad qui delectus non eaque necessitatibus. Id eaque maxime ut consectetur cumque aut magnam. Ducimus autem laborum delectus corrupti itaque labore.

Voluptatem iusto ut ut magni autem omnis et perspiciatis. Consectetur sapiente dignissimos totam sit nostrum nam sapiente. Omnis ipsam porro consequatur dolor. Autem provident dolores eveniet eum id impedit nostrum debitis.

Dolorem quis ut quos porro in unde officia. Rerum ut molestiae reprehenderit facilis quibusdam quo eveniet. Rerum unde exercitationem quod perspiciatis nemo possimus sit quia. In atque dignissimos ea quos sunt. Qui voluptatibus ut tempora. Minus at debitis cupiditate amet dolorem tempora cumque.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”