Top Cities For Venture Capital In The US and Internationally?

Bit curious as to what you all view as the top VC markets in the US/Internationally currently? In the US, I'd assume that the San Francisco Bay Area is the top but what other major cities do you see as hotbeds for lots of activity right now? Also looking on towards the future, what are some up and coming areas and do you see any areas in decline anytime soon? Same questions apply for international markets.

EDIT: Someone brought up a great point about the quality of startups in a lot of these major cities. Where do you see startups actually being successful and undergoing meaningful exits?

 

From what I've witnessed (just my perspective):

SF Bay Area

(gap)

NYC Boston Austin Los Angeles Seattle A few others...

The ventrue capital industry is more prominent in the US than abroad, but internationally big players include:

London, Shanghai, Beijing, etc.. India, Israel, and Germany also have significant activity.

 

According to Ryan Howard, the next Silicon Valley is the "Silicon Prairie" of Southwestern Ohio. Hence why he moved to Miami, OH a "big university town"

Does the Tiger fire the Monkey? Does the Tiger transfer the Monkey to another branch?
 

The Bay Area leads by a mile. Boston (really) follows, then New York, LA, and Seattle in that order.

Check CBI or Pitchbook if you need to confirm.

Here are a couple articles (same author) with no paywall with pretty fresh data: CityLab (2014) and The Atlantic (2016).

Boston is the sleeper people forget about. It's the cluster for hard sciences: aeronautics, robotics, a ton of machine learning, and life sciences.

It's hard to build proprietary dealflow up there, too. It's a mafia, especially in life sciences. They take care of their own. The same set of guys start a series of companies across a decade out of the same lab research they were doing as a group. They show them to the same set of investors, and as they get liquidity from their first exits, become LPs in those same investors' funds and also angels for the younger staff in their labs who want to try their own hand as founders.

Larry Bock, before he passed, is a fantastic example. The man was prolific and a genius (started 50 companies with a combined market cap of over $70bn just from those that were public exits), and nobody outside of the life sciences community knew about him. See:

  • the memoriam from the guys at Lux
  • the Xconomy memoriam
  • a summary in the WSJ of companies he started
I am permanently behind on PMs, it's not personal.
 
APAE:
The Bay Area leads by a mile. Boston (really) follows, then New York, LA, and Seattle in that order.

Check CBI or Pitchbook if you need to confirm.

Here are a couple articles (same author) with no paywall with pretty fresh data: CityLab (2014) and The Atlantic (2016).

Boston is the sleeper people forget about. It's the cluster for hard sciences: aeronautics, robotics, a ton of machine learning, and life sciences.

It's hard to build proprietary dealflow up there, too. It's a mafia, especially in life sciences. They take care of their own. The same set of guys start a series of companies across a decade out of the same lab research they were doing as a group. They show them to the same set of investors, and as they get liquidity from their first exits, become LPs in those same investors' funds and also angels for the younger staff in their labs who want to try their own hand as founders.

Larry Bock, before he passed, is a fantastic example. The man was prolific and a genius (started 50 companies with a combined market cap of over $70bn just from those that were public exits), and nobody outside of the life sciences community knew about him. See: - the memoriam from the guys at Lux - the Xconomy memoriam - a summary in the WSJ of companies he started

Re Larry Bock: You forgot to add that he was actually blind from the age 29.

 

5 million I've learned (from a friend with a major disability) that pointing out someone's accomplishments despite their disability may seem well-intentioned ("wow, look at how hard he worked to overcome") but is actually a slap in the face to someone who views themselves as normal and wants to be treated as such.

I am permanently behind on PMs, it's not personal.
 
APAE:
Boston is the sleeper people forget about. It's the cluster for hard sciences: aeronautics, robotics, a ton of machine learning, and life sciences.

Good point. I remember the first time I read about Route 128. I don't think most people know how instrumental Boston was and is to technology. If you haven't read it already, you'll like this post.

Also, thanks for sharing re: Larry Bock. Seems like an incredible guy.

Maximum effort.
 
APAE:
Boston is the sleeper people forget about. It's the cluster for hard sciences: aeronautics, robotics, a ton of machine learning, and life sciences.

It's hard to build proprietary dealflow up there, too. It's a mafia, especially in life sciences. They take care of their own. The same set of guys start a series of companies across a decade out of the same lab research they were doing as a group. They show them to the same set of investors, and as they get liquidity from their first exits, become LPs in those same investors' funds and also angels for the younger staff in their labs who want to try their own hand as founders.

This. I have been able to see this firsthand through a personal relationship of mine (don't want to go into detail as this is a public forum). So far I have not observed this trend anywhere else in major VC hubs. It's quite unique and just goes to show how you do not have to start out in finance or anything and still can still make the transition over to VC. However, in order to break into the Boston VC scene at the moment, it seems that you need a somewhat heavy science background.

 

In the very post you replied to, I included two links to publicly available articles and also mentioned two paid resources you could use as well if you had access.

APAE:
The Bay Area leads by a mile. Boston (really) follows, then New York, LA, and Seattle in that order.

Check CBI or Pitchbook if you need to confirm.

Here are a couple articles (same author) with no paywall with pretty fresh data: CityLab (2014) and The Atlantic (2016).

I am permanently behind on PMs, it's not personal.
 

From what I've seen, if you look at the scale of the startups, obviously SV, LA and NY top the list.

But the game changes once you account for the QUALITY of startups. If you take that parameter into account, and look at the places where such tangible value is actually being generated, the list shifts.

SF still takes the top position. Boston and Austin are other places where innovation is happening. London, Paris, Berlin and Stockholm are some of the European cities. Dubai is a very small, yet rising center in the Middle East, and seems to be popular with a lot of Russians for some reason (maybe because Moscow faltered). Tel Aviv is a huge place for startups. In Asia, there's Singapore, Shanghai, Beijing, Shenzhen, and Bangalore to some extent. Bangkok, like Dubai, is increasingly becoming popular, but small. Australia has a very small ecosystem in Sydney, and I think Auckland will become increasingly popular too. Santiago in Chile would be one to watch out for too.

If you are looking at joining a VC firm though, best to stick with those in traditional financial centres such as NY, SF, LA, London, etc. because most of these startups in smaller cities flock to these cities anyways for funding.

GoldenCinderblock: "I keep spending all my money on exotic fish so my armor sucks. Is it possible to romance multiple females? I got with the blue chick so far but I am also interested in the electronic chick and the face mask chick."
 

Zero startups in Japan. Macron's going to do shit for the VC economy - his pushing forward with a dumb austerity agenda.

GoldenCinderblock: "I keep spending all my money on exotic fish so my armor sucks. Is it possible to romance multiple females? I got with the blue chick so far but I am also interested in the electronic chick and the face mask chick."
 

In China, it's absolutely Beijing and Shenzhen (hardware focus) over Shanghai.

Also, a week ago in the FT: "Investments in private tech companies in Asia have topped those in the US for the first time" (can't seem to post link yet). Granted, this is Asia overall but gives you a sense of the dynamics. Think people outside of China still somewhat underestimate the scale/growth of the venture/tech space here.

 

Europe needs a European VC hub. That means a VC hub which operates in English not in German/French/Spanish . Domestic talent , however good it is (which is never better than pooling people from a bigger population) it will make at best a local hub, not a regional one. Foreign talent is essential

 

Hmm, some of these comments seem quite outdated. Things are changing very quickly in this industry and I'd say in 2017,

SF Bay Area #1 of course Then Boston, NYC, LA (growing fast!) Then Chicago, Seattle, Austin

Internationally,

London, Beijing, Shanghai Then Shenzhen, Tel Aviv, Mumbai, Seoul, Frankfurt Then Jakarta, Toronto, Paris, Bangalore, Moscow

Singapore and Hong Kong aren't doing too well in the VC space actually. Singapore is on a down trend except in the fintech space and Hong Kong was never a startup/VC hub.

Whoever mentioned Tokyo or any other Japanese cities may be 50 years too early. Japanese are the most risk-averse people I know and this makes it very hard for the country to develop any startup/VC hub.

Some mentioned how Shanghai is not a big startup hub, but it really is in many, many sectors.

Not everyone is meant to make a difference. But for me, the choice to lead an ordinary life is no longer an option.
 

Boston seems to be where it is at for VC on the East Coast. The only issue I see with Boston is that it is too focused in one niche: biotech, whereas in the SF Bay Area, there's a multitude of different industries to invest in. Call me crazy but it may actually be easier to break into VC in the SF Bay Area because from what I've seen so far in Boston, the majority of GP's, prinicapls, etc, were former scientists themselves.

 

I agree with what many people mentioned but I'll elaborate a few things.

SF Bay Area is by far the best place for any startup.

[Major gap - why? because it's really hard to find really GREAT product folks outside Silicon Valley... Mark Suster on carpool.vc talks about this this]

NYC LA (this is higher if you are looking at consumer/media...) Boston (this is higher if you are looking at biotech) Seattle Chicago (Groupon is still king but new ones are emerging such as Uptake and Tempus) Austin

A major one a lot of folks is forgetting is Pittsburgh especially with autonomous driving (ATC, Argo AI, Aurora.tech), robotics (Astrobotics, Carnegie Robots), CMU, AlphaLab and other examples such as Helomics, Schell Games, Duolingo.

Other areas I've seen that are interesting : Detroit/Ann Arbor (FarmLogs, Benzinga, Millendo Therapeutics, Duo Security... and several autonomous driving) Atlanta (MailChimp, Namely) Chattanooga (SupplyHog, Bellhop) Boise/Idaho (Cradlepoint, Clearwater Analytics, TSheets, Meal Ticket, Rohinni) Las Vegas (OrderWithMe)

International China is probably the largest VC outside the US, then Japan (SoftBank)... in terms of companies Israel (lot's of really great cyber especially with 8200). And lastly, LATAM has a lot of interesting startup activities especially Brazil and Colombia.

 
atlas11546:
NYC LA (this is higher if you are looking at consumer/media...) Boston (this is higher if you are looking at biotech) Seattle Chicago (Groupon is still king but new ones are emerging such as Uptake and Tempus) Austin

Is this in order of what you think is the best? And personally I am very interested in working in Boston VC but as far as I can tell, the majority of startups in the area are in biotech. I feel like NYC would be a little more diverse in terms of sector.

 

Similique recusandae iure dignissimos qui. Modi velit ut incidunt id aspernatur architecto labore. Corporis doloremque explicabo est ad temporibus.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”